2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2006.12.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chicxulub impact predates K–T boundary: New evidence from Brazos, Texas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
80
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
80
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…whilst there is a close match between the timing of the Chicxulub impact crater in Mexico and the end-Cretaceous mass extinction, 65.6 million years ago, there is growing evidence [3] that even this massive impact did not alone cause the extinction. Furthermore, the evidence for major impacts at the time of other mass extinctions is sparse or non-existent; therefore some other mechanism needs to be invoked.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…whilst there is a close match between the timing of the Chicxulub impact crater in Mexico and the end-Cretaceous mass extinction, 65.6 million years ago, there is growing evidence [3] that even this massive impact did not alone cause the extinction. Furthermore, the evidence for major impacts at the time of other mass extinctions is sparse or non-existent; therefore some other mechanism needs to be invoked.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, superdeep borehole SG-6 in the Urengoy Rift penetrated more than 1 km of basaltic lava before being abandoned, with seismic data suggesting at least a further 1 km of basalt below this level [20] . A 'working estimate' for the total volume of eruptives and shallow-level intrusives is 3 million km 3 , with an error of about 1 million km 3 either way. To put this into perspective, 3 million km 3 would bury an area equivalent to the entire UK beneath a layer of basalt some 12 km thick, or an area the size of China beneath a layer about 300 m thick.…”
Section: Extent and Volume Of The Siberian Trapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It has been suggested that the Chicxulub impact preceded the K/T event and that a second large and as-yet unknown impact coincided with the K/T mass extinction. This multiple impact scenario is based on the stratigraphic position of proximal Chicxulub impact ejecta deposits in northeastern Mexico and Texas, where lenses of ejecta spherules are locally embedded within the Maastrichtian marls, for instance, at the Loma Cerca, the El Penon, and the Brazos K/T sections (Keller et al , 2007. Additionally, Keller et al (2004) interpreted a 0.66 m thick cross-bedded and dolomitized calcarenite overlying the suevite breccia in the Yaxopoil-1 drill core as a long-term latest Maastrichtian deposit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%