2002
DOI: 10.1051/gse:2002021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ChickRH6: a chicken whole-genome radiation hybrid panel

Abstract: -As a first step towards the development of radiation hybrid maps, we have produced a radiation hybrid panel in the chicken by fusing female embryonic diploid fibroblasts irradiated at 6 000 rads with HPRT-deficient hamster Wg3hCl 2 cells. Due to the low retention frequency of the chicken fragments, a high number of clones was produced from which the best ones were selected. Thus, 452 fusion clones were tested for retention frequencies with a panel of 46 markers. Based on these results, 103 clones with a mean … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
52
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(43 reference statements)
3
52
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The average retention rate for the markers was 23.7%, in accordance with the first estimates for the panel [24]. The retention frequency along the chromosome, as estimated by plotting the retention of the markers from the framework map against their positions, demonstrates that the higher retention rates were [15].…”
Section: Construction Of the Gga14 Rh Map Marker Retentionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The average retention rate for the markers was 23.7%, in accordance with the first estimates for the panel [24]. The retention frequency along the chromosome, as estimated by plotting the retention of the markers from the framework map against their positions, demonstrates that the higher retention rates were [15].…”
Section: Construction Of the Gga14 Rh Map Marker Retentionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…This can explain the higher retention rate observed for microchromosome markers when constructing the panel [24], since they have a higher chance than macrochromosome markers of being close to the centromere. …”
Section: Marker Retention and Position Of The Centromerementioning
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations