Insertional Mutagenesis Strategies in Cancer Genetics 2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-7656-7_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chicken Models of Retroviral Insertional Mutagenesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 154 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering provirus positions and orientations, all insertions into CISs corresponded to the promoter insertion mechanism where the transcription of a resident cellular gene is driven by the inserted proviral promoter (30). No case of enhancer insertion (where provirus regulatory sequences boost, at a distance, the gene's transcription from its own promoter) or the formation of a recombinant oncogenetransducing retrovirus was observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering provirus positions and orientations, all insertions into CISs corresponded to the promoter insertion mechanism where the transcription of a resident cellular gene is driven by the inserted proviral promoter (30). No case of enhancer insertion (where provirus regulatory sequences boost, at a distance, the gene's transcription from its own promoter) or the formation of a recombinant oncogenetransducing retrovirus was observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structure of MAV-2 provirus plus sites of start (bent arrow), splicing (dotted lines), and termination [poly(A)] of its transcript are shown (upper drawing). The activity of the 3= LTR promoter in a nondefective provirus is blocked by transcriptional interference(30). The mechanism of formation of hybrid MAV-2/cancer gene mRNAs is suggested (lower drawings).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%