1974
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1974.111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chiasmata have no effect on fertility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cohen (1973) maintains that there is a positive correlation between sperm redundancy (the number of sperm ejaculated to fertilise a single egg) and chiasma count, covering a great diversity of species with totally different reproductive physiology. Within related species, Wallace (1974) could not find such a relation.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 79%
“…Cohen (1973) maintains that there is a positive correlation between sperm redundancy (the number of sperm ejaculated to fertilise a single egg) and chiasma count, covering a great diversity of species with totally different reproductive physiology. Within related species, Wallace (1974) could not find such a relation.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 79%
“…Cohen (1973,1975) suggested that spermatozoa may be of two kinds, only one of which is normally permitted to reach the fertilization site at the time of fertilization, by selection in the female tract. He has been misquoted (Wallace, 1974;Gwatkin, 1977) as asserting that only a small proportion of spermatozoa can fertilize; the problem of whether each spermatozoon can fertilize if it gets to an egg remains to be solved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Good evidence exists that they so act in several rodent spe-cies (Martan and Shepherd, 1976;Hartung and Dewsbury, 1978;Milligan, 1979;Murie and McLean, 1980;Michener, 1984), but several exceptions exist (Hartung and Dewsbury, 1978;Oglesby et al, 1981;Dewsbury, 1988). Cohen's (1973) hypothesis that deformed sperm arise from uncorrected mistakes of meiosis in a diploid organism has been questioned before (Wallace, 1974;Bedford et al, 1984), but Baker and Bellis's is the first suggestion that the deformities are adaptive. I here discuss their "kamikaze" sperm hypothesis in detail, taking into account their modifications of the hypothesis (Baker and Bellis, 1989) in the light of a previous brief criticism of it (Harcourt, 1989).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%