1992
DOI: 10.1213/00000539-199212000-00026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chiari I Malformation Presenting as Recurrent Spinal Headache

Abstract: ostdural puncture headache (PDPH) is a wellrecognized complication after spinal anesthesia P (1). When conservative treatment or epidural blood patch (EBP) fail, alternative causes of the headache need to be reconsidered. We present a previously unreported association of recurrent PDPH with a Chiari I malformation. Case ReportA 31-yr-old woman (gravida 1, para 0), with an unremarkable medical history, received analgesia for labor via a lumbar epidural catheter. Subsequently, when she required cesarean section … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In two case reports, the ACM was unknown at the time of delivery and only diagnosed subsequently because of adverse neurological outcomes. 4,5 There have also been reports of successful spinal neuraxial anaesthesia in women with surgically corrected Type I ACM. In these cases, there was active involvement of the neurosurgical team, and it was determined that a neuraxial anaesthesia was not contraindicated because a dural puncture should neither impair CSF flux nor precipitate bulbar compression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In two case reports, the ACM was unknown at the time of delivery and only diagnosed subsequently because of adverse neurological outcomes. 4,5 There have also been reports of successful spinal neuraxial anaesthesia in women with surgically corrected Type I ACM. In these cases, there was active involvement of the neurosurgical team, and it was determined that a neuraxial anaesthesia was not contraindicated because a dural puncture should neither impair CSF flux nor precipitate bulbar compression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, neuraxial anesthesia techniques are not contraindicated if a post-surgical MRI shows that the cerebellar tonsils ascend above the foramen magnum. Spinal neuraxial anesthesia performed in mothers who were found later to have uncorrected Type I ACM and syringomyelia was complicated by neurological worsening, persistent headaches,[13] nystagmus, and oscillopsia. [4] Signs and symptoms may develop up to 2 weeks after a dural puncture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4] Signs and symptoms may develop up to 2 weeks after a dural puncture. [413] On the other hand, there are reports of successful neuraxial spinal anesthesia in women with surgically corrected Type I ACM. [141721] There are case reports of epidural anesthesia done with injection of small local anesthetic bolus (3–4 ml) doses at 5-min intervals, with a total divided dose of 20 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine plus fentanyl 50 μ g, with excellent results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two case reports of aggravated signs and symptoms within two weeks of dural puncture have been described in syringomyelia associated with Arnold-Chiari malformation. [18][19][20] Daskalakis et al 1 described an uncomplicated elective Cesarean delivery under general anesthesia in the presence of PTS. The authors discussed both general and epidural anesthesia as possible techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%