2020
DOI: 10.1128/aem.00599-20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CheY1 and CheY2 of Azorhizobium caulinodans ORS571 Regulate Chemotaxis and Competitive Colonization with the Host Plant

Abstract: The genome of Azorhizobium caulinodans ORS571 encodes two chemotaxis response regulators: CheY1 and CheY2. cheY1 is located in a chemotaxis cluster (cheAWY1BR), while cheY2 is located 37 kb upstream of the cheAWY1BR cluster. To determine the contributions of CheY1 and CheY2, we compared the wild type (WT) and mutants in the free-living state and in symbiosis with the host Sesbania rostrata. Swim plate tests and capillary assays revealed that both CheY1 and CheY2 play roles in chemotaxis, with CheY2 having a mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data demonstrate that: (a) both CheYs are required for the full chemotactic response of A. fabrum to nutrient gradient; (b) CheY1 and CheY2 have significantly different effects on the chemotactic response of A. fabrum , with CheY2 being more important than CheY1 for the chemotactic response. These results are consistent with a previous study on A. fabrum [ 45 ] and the different effects of two CheYs on the chemotactic response of A. fabrum are similar to those of Rhizobium meliloti [ 17 ] and Azorhizobium caulinodans [ 18 ]. The complementation of CheY1 and CheY2 to the corresponding CheY-deficient mutants (Δy1 and Δy2) confirms that the mutants were constructed correctly and did not affect the normal expression of other genes.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The data demonstrate that: (a) both CheYs are required for the full chemotactic response of A. fabrum to nutrient gradient; (b) CheY1 and CheY2 have significantly different effects on the chemotactic response of A. fabrum , with CheY2 being more important than CheY1 for the chemotactic response. These results are consistent with a previous study on A. fabrum [ 45 ] and the different effects of two CheYs on the chemotactic response of A. fabrum are similar to those of Rhizobium meliloti [ 17 ] and Azorhizobium caulinodans [ 18 ]. The complementation of CheY1 and CheY2 to the corresponding CheY-deficient mutants (Δy1 and Δy2) confirms that the mutants were constructed correctly and did not affect the normal expression of other genes.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Some bacteria have only one complete set of core chemotaxis proteins, but two or more CheYs. For example, both Rhizobium (now, Sinorhizobium or Ensifer ) meliloti [ 17 ] and Azorhizobium caulinodans [ 18 ] have only one complete set of core chemotaxis proteins, but two CheYs. The phenotypes of cheY -deletion mutants of both bacteria show that both CheYs are required for full tactic response with one CheY having a more prominent role than the other CheY.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with our bioinformatics analysis, deletion of cheA does not alter the cellular localization of CheZ AC ( Figure 3 ). We then tested the localization pattern of CheZ AC in the following chemotaxis mutants, Δ cheY1 , Δ cheY2 , or Δ cheA-R clusters (including cheA , cheY2 , cheW , cheB , and cheR ) ( Liu W. et al, 2018 ; Liu et al, 2020 ). Interestingly, CheZ AC maintains polar localization in both the Δ cheY1 , Δ cheY2 , and Δ cheA-R mutants backgrounds ( Figure 3 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 650-bp fragment was amplified with primers AcfRDF and AcfRDR (Table 2 ) and cloned into the pCM351::UF after restriction with ApaI and Age1. The positive plasmid (pCM351::UF::DF) was transformed into ORS571 by using pRK2013 as the helper plasmid [ 24 ], and the acfR gene deletion mutant was subsequently screened based on homologous double exchange as previously described [ 26 ]. The correct integration of the mutants was confirmed by PCR and named Δ acfR.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motility assays were performed on 0.3% soft agar L3 plates according to previous publications [ 26 ]. The L3 plates contained a 10 mM carbon source (sodium lactate or glycine) and 10 mM NH 4 Cl.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%