2019
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1901.07031
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CheXpert: A Large Chest Radiograph Dataset with Uncertainty Labels and Expert Comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
113
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
113
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A. Datasets and Settings 1) Experimental settings: We conduct experiments on the NIH Chest-Xray14 dataset [8] and CheXpert dataset [9], two large-scale CXR datasets. In our experiments, we use dilated ResNet50 [33] as the backbone.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A. Datasets and Settings 1) Experimental settings: We conduct experiments on the NIH Chest-Xray14 dataset [8] and CheXpert dataset [9], two large-scale CXR datasets. In our experiments, we use dilated ResNet50 [33] as the backbone.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) Abnormality classification: The authors of CheXpert [9] propose an evaluation protocol over 5 categories: "Atelectasis", "Cardiomegaly", "Consolidation", "Edema", and "Pleural Effusion", which were selected based on the clinical importance and prevalence from the validation set. In this experiment, we use the official set to train all the models, and show the AUC scores of these 5 abnormalities on official validation set.…”
Section: Chexpert Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations