Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chewing gum for enhancing early recovery of bowel function after caesarean section

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recent meta-analysis suggested that gum-chewing in the immediate postoperative period after a cesarean section is a well tolerated intervention that enhances early recovery of bowel function. [24] However, as to the effect of gum-chewing after colorectal resection, the results remained inconsistent based on the latest studies [25,26] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recent meta-analysis suggested that gum-chewing in the immediate postoperative period after a cesarean section is a well tolerated intervention that enhances early recovery of bowel function. [24] However, as to the effect of gum-chewing after colorectal resection, the results remained inconsistent based on the latest studies [25,26] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ERAS protocol for cesarean delivery includes postoperative gum chewing 18 because it can stimulate bowel function and increase peristalsis 29 . Findings from a 2016 Cochrane review showed that patients who chewed gum experienced the first passage of flatus and stool earlier than patients who did not chew gum (ie, seven and nine hours respectively), and that gum chewing reduced the rate of ileus occurrence more than 60% 30 . However, the review authors noted that the quality of evidence related to gum chewing was low and very low.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PROSPERO registry of systematic reviews can provide transparency in the process and accountability for the study, and prevent unintended duplication of reviews. Unfortunately, as demonstrated by the recent publication of five systematic reviews on the use of chewing gum after Cesarean section, all showing a benefit and none yet having a noticeable impact on clinical practice, the availability of a platform for prospective registration of review protocols does not yet preclude research waste in this area. The impact of any tool is dependent on its uptake by researchers and, clearly, use of the PROSPERO registry is not yet fully established.…”
Section: The Problem Of Research Waste In Obstetricsmentioning
confidence: 99%