Chest X-ray features of SARS-CoV-2 in the emergency department: a multicenter experience from northern Italian hospitals

Abstract

To evaluate the imaging features of routine admission chest X-ray in patients referred for novel Coronavirus 2019 infection. Methods: All patients referred to the emergency departments, RT-PCR positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection were evaluated. Demographic and clinical data were recorded. Two radiologists (8 and 15 years of experience) reviewed all the X-ray images and evaluated the following findings: interstitial opacities, alveolar opacities (AO), AO associated with consolidation, consolidation and/or pleural effusion. We stratified patients in groups according to the time interval between symptoms onset (cut-off 5 days) and X-ray imaging and according to age (cut-off 60 years old). Computed tomography was performed in case of a discrepancy between clinical symptoms, laboratory and X-ray findings, and/or suspicion of complications. Results: A total of 468 patients were tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Lung lesions primarily manifested as interstitial opacities (71.7%) and AO opacities (60.5%), more frequently bilateral (64.5%) and with a peripheral predominance (62.5%). Patients admitted to the emergency radiology department after 5 days from symptoms onset, more frequently had interstitial and AO opacities, in comparison to those admitted within 5 days, and lung lesions were more frequently bilateral and peripheral. Older patients more frequently presented interstitial and AO opacities in comparison to younger ones. Sixty-eight patients underwent CT that principally showed the presence of ground-glass opacities and consolidations. Conclusions: The most common X-ray pattern is multifocal and peripheral, associated with interstitial and alveolar opacities. Chest X-ray, compared to CT, can be considered a reliable diagnostic tool, especially in the Emergency setting.

Differentiating influenza from COVID-19 in patients presenting with suspected sepsis

“…The finding that patients with COVID-19 with abnormalities on chest X-ray had more often bilateral abnormalities is in accordance with previous studies [19]. The presence of abnormalities, both unilateral and bilateral, was predictive for COVID-19, but in our series of influenza patients, inclusion was not based on the presence of lung infiltrates.…”

“…p values < .05 were considered statistically significant. A multivariable logistic regression model was built, where the viral infection during hospitalization was used as the outcome (influenza or COVID- 19). Parameters that were statistically significant in the univariate analysis were inserted in the starting model.…”

Current treatment of COVID-19 in renal patients: hope or hype?

“…Findings are often peripheral, bilateral and involving the lower lobes. Also chest X-ray can be considered a reliable diagnostic tool, especially in the emergency setting [ 2 , 5 – 7 ]. Actually, the therapeutic management of SARS-CoV-2 infection has many fields of action.…”

Imaging algorithm for COVID-19: A practical approach

“…They also had 10% (7/68) of patients who had negative CXR but were found to have GGO on CT scan. 39 A normal CXR does not rule out the possibility of pneumonia in general and, expressly, does not exclude the diagnosis of pneumonia in patients with suspected COVID. However, chest radiography is valuable to image the evolution of COVID-19 pneumonia, which can be followed using serial CXR.…”