2020
DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2019.07.92
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chest wall resection and reconstruction by composite prosthesis for locally recurrent breast carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, we found a meager rate of prosthetic infection, to the point that only one prosthesis was removed for infection out of a total of 32. We also highlighted these reliability and efficiency data in another series published by our group in about 166 cases of patients with all tumor types, primary and secondary, who underwent chest wall resection and rigid prosthesis reconstruction over 18 years, where only 8 patients required prosthesis removal for infection [ 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Finally, we found a meager rate of prosthetic infection, to the point that only one prosthesis was removed for infection out of a total of 32. We also highlighted these reliability and efficiency data in another series published by our group in about 166 cases of patients with all tumor types, primary and secondary, who underwent chest wall resection and rigid prosthesis reconstruction over 18 years, where only 8 patients required prosthesis removal for infection [ 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…6,8,9 It is also the most common indication for prosthetic graft removal. 10 Most infections were related to the sandwich technique of reconstruction, where a methyl-methacrylate plate is sandwiched between two mesh and used for rigid support.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%