1998
DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1998.84.6.2060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chest wall mechanics in sustained microgravity

Abstract: We assessed the effects of sustained weightlessness on chest wall mechanics in five astronauts who were studied before, during, and after the 10-day Spacelab D-2 mission (n = 3) and the 180-day Euromir-95 mission (n = 2). We measured flow and pressure at the mouth and rib cage and abdominal volumes during resting breathing and during a relaxation maneuver from midinspiratory capacity to functional residual capacity. Microgravity produced marked and consistent changes (Delta) in the contribution of the abdomen … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was an increase in abdominal contribution to tidal breathing, which rose from 31% to 58% in microgravity [21]. This is consistent with results from parabolic flight, in which there was an increase in abdominal wall compliance but not in rib cage compliance [22] consistent with only small changes in chest-wall shape, making for a slightly more circular rib cage [23,24].…”
Section: Lung Volumes and Expiratory Flowssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…There was an increase in abdominal contribution to tidal breathing, which rose from 31% to 58% in microgravity [21]. This is consistent with results from parabolic flight, in which there was an increase in abdominal wall compliance but not in rib cage compliance [22] consistent with only small changes in chest-wall shape, making for a slightly more circular rib cage [23,24].…”
Section: Lung Volumes and Expiratory Flowssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Interestingly, spaceflight also resulted in a significant reduction in rib B.Ar in unoperated control animals (Flight + Sham vs. Ground + Sham), which may be explained by the reduction in rib cage expansion observed during breathing in astronauts 31 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The subjects were equipped with two respiratory inductive plethysmograph (RIP) belts, placed respectively on the rib cage (RC) and the abdomen (AB) for the recording of the thoracic and abdominal respiratory movements. After calibration by an isovolume maneuver, the sum of these signals, each proportional to cross-section variation, is used as a measure of the lung volume variation (40). An electrocardiogram (ECG) was recorded with a traditional three-lead configuration.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before the paced breathing protocols, three standard isovolume maneuvers were performed at FRC with a closed glottis, which allowed the calibration of RIP on the AB and RC signals to give a signal proportional to the respired volume. During the isovolume maneuver, the ratio of volume motion coefficients (X/Y) is equal to the ratio of RC/AB signal amplitude (40). The respired volume was computed using the following equation: ⌬Vol ϭ X AB ϩ Y RC where X and Y are the RIP volume motion coefficients.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%