2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2014.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chest reporting by radiographers: Findings of an accredited postgraduate programme

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…23,24 Previous studies have reported mean sensitivity and SPC ranging from 81% to 98% and 95% to 100%, respectively, for radiographers in the developed world. 2,4 Performance in many of these studies was adjusted for training and body part. A meta-analysis has shown insignificant variation in performance between trained (sensitivity 5 92.9%; SPC 5 97.8%) and untrained radiographers (sensitivity 5 96.0%; SPC 5 93.7%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…23,24 Previous studies have reported mean sensitivity and SPC ranging from 81% to 98% and 95% to 100%, respectively, for radiographers in the developed world. 2,4 Performance in many of these studies was adjusted for training and body part. A meta-analysis has shown insignificant variation in performance between trained (sensitivity 5 92.9%; SPC 5 97.8%) and untrained radiographers (sensitivity 5 96.0%; SPC 5 93.7%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…124 In some countries, chest X-ray constitutes about 20% of all radiological examinations. 4 It is a non-invasive and quick examination; however, it is considered one of the most challenging radiological examinations to interpret. 5 Reasons for this challenge include but are not limited to anatomical noise caused by superimposition of thoracic structures, similarity in radiographic appearances of some chest diseases, and subtlety of some chest pathologies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations