2022
DOI: 10.1155/2022/4732988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chest CT Scan Features to Predict COVID-19 Patients’ Outcome and Survival

Abstract: Background. Providing efficient care for infectious coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients requires an accurate and accessible tool to medically optimize medical resource allocation to high-risk patients. Purpose. To assess the predictive value of on-admission chest CT characteristics to estimate COVID-19 patients’ outcome and survival time. Materials and Methods. Using a case-control design, we included all laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 patients who were deceased, from June to September 2020, in a terti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The evaluation of tomographic patterns in COVID-19 was also essential to predict clinical outcomes to optimizing the allocation of resources during the pandemic, a metanalysis have shown that its application in this context, using diverse methods of semi-quantitative evaluation, leads to good values of sensitivity and specificity with correlation with disease severity and mortality in COVID-19 patients [ 30 ]. However, most of this score’s systems were not validated and were not further study in a large cohort or in critically ill patients, mostly studies were involving patients on the ward [ 11 , 12 , 18 , 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The evaluation of tomographic patterns in COVID-19 was also essential to predict clinical outcomes to optimizing the allocation of resources during the pandemic, a metanalysis have shown that its application in this context, using diverse methods of semi-quantitative evaluation, leads to good values of sensitivity and specificity with correlation with disease severity and mortality in COVID-19 patients [ 30 ]. However, most of this score’s systems were not validated and were not further study in a large cohort or in critically ill patients, mostly studies were involving patients on the ward [ 11 , 12 , 18 , 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some points may explain the divergent results. First, there was no standardization of the scores used in the studies [ 11 , 12 , 31 , 34 ], generating high variance in the definitions of severity in Chest-CT. Second, the studies have mostly evaluated patients outside intensive care [ 11 , 12 , 31 , 34 ], which makes comparison with the collective of critically ill patients difficult. Moreover, the collective of critically ill patients in our study is represented by patients with severe disease representing a higher chance of death from the disease compared to patients with mild or moderate disease, which represents more than 80% of the patients in the ward [ 35 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the risk of flares after COVID-19 and vaccination in patients with MS was 12.8% and 7.7%, respectively, confirming the lower risk of flare after vaccination compared to COVID-19. Of note, COVID-19-related morbidity and mortality are significantly higher in unvaccinated AI-IMD patients [ 95 , 96 ]. Putting all together, vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in AI-IMD patients not only minimizes post-COVID-19 morbidity and mortality but also has a lower risk of flare compared to infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with our data, previous studies have demonstrated the overall prognostic value of Chest-CT depending on pulmonary involvement. [ 16 ] In addition, our study included the first prognostic assessment using the RSNA-template.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%