2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.arbres.2022.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chest CT as a Prognostic Tool in COVID-19

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These patterns were found to be closely associated with clinical outcomes, with ground glass opacities being the most commonly found pattern and having a higher incidence of death compared to other patterns. The findings of this study are important for the management of COVID-19 patients, as they can help in the early identification of patients at high risk of mortality and the initiation of appropriate treatment [19,20]. The study also highlights the importance of CT chest scans in the diagnosis and management of COVID-19 patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…These patterns were found to be closely associated with clinical outcomes, with ground glass opacities being the most commonly found pattern and having a higher incidence of death compared to other patterns. The findings of this study are important for the management of COVID-19 patients, as they can help in the early identification of patients at high risk of mortality and the initiation of appropriate treatment [19,20]. The study also highlights the importance of CT chest scans in the diagnosis and management of COVID-19 patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) has demonstrated high level of accuracy for diagnosing and monitoring COVID-19 pneumonia [6][7][8], but it has several limitations in clinical practice due to reduced availability, high-cost, radiation exposure and need for patient transfer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Em nosso estudo, encontramos uma mortalidade maior (24%), porém nossa avaliação começou após este período (28 de junho de 2020), abrangendo 1 ano de acompanhamento e incluindo o período mais crítico da pandemia que foi em 2021. Com relação ao tempo médio que estes pacientes ficaram internados, encontramos uma média de 8 dias com AIQ:(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17). Em outros estudos, a média foi um pouco maior, tal como12 dias (DIAS VMCH, et al, 2020) e 10 dias (SANTOS PSA, et al, 2021).…”
unclassified