2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00432-016-2127-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemotherapy with or without autologous cytokine-induced killer cell transfusion as the first-line treatment for stage IV gastrointestinal cancer: a phase II clinical trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The killing effect of CIK cells on tumor cells is mainly via expression of LFA-1, which specifically binds to ICAM-1 (CD54) on the surface of tumor cells, resulting in the secretion of benzyloxycarbonyl-L-lysine thiobenzyl ester esterase (granzyme A) that can penetrate the cell membrane and lead to tumor cell death (50). However, previous experiments have demonstrated that the efficacy of CIK/NK cells alone for the treatment of patients with high-risk stage IV NB is limited (51). This is due to the large amount of complement fragments produced by anti-GD2 antibodies during the killing of NB tumor cells, which can cause severe pain (52).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The killing effect of CIK cells on tumor cells is mainly via expression of LFA-1, which specifically binds to ICAM-1 (CD54) on the surface of tumor cells, resulting in the secretion of benzyloxycarbonyl-L-lysine thiobenzyl ester esterase (granzyme A) that can penetrate the cell membrane and lead to tumor cell death (50). However, previous experiments have demonstrated that the efficacy of CIK/NK cells alone for the treatment of patients with high-risk stage IV NB is limited (51). This is due to the large amount of complement fragments produced by anti-GD2 antibodies during the killing of NB tumor cells, which can cause severe pain (52).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerically longer PFS and OS rates were achieved with the combination despite failure to show a significant difference (PFS: 5.6 vs. 3.8 months, p: 0.06; OS: 13.9 vs. 11 months in combined versus chemotherapy arms, respectively). Although the CD8 (+) ratio was not different, patients in the combined arm showed an improved humoral immune response with increased NK, and CD4 (+) helper T cells [95]. In a prospective phase II trial by Zhao et al [96] 122 patients were randomized to autologous CIK cells combined with chemotherapy or to chemotherapy alone.…”
Section: Adoptive Cell Therapy: Cytokine-induced Killer Cells As An I...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was no significant change in the aforementioned serum tumor marker levels in the control group. No severe CIK-related toxicity was observed, and the most common side effect of CIK was fever [ 13 ].…”
Section: Clinical Studies On Cik Cell Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OS rates of CRC patients in the study and control groups were 75% and 15%, respectively. OS and DFS were prolonged significantly in the DC-CIK therapy group ( P < 0.01) Fever was the most common side effect of DC-CIK therapy Xu [ 13 ] 2016 IV Phase II clinical trial 12 16 (6 CRC patients) 17 (6 CRC patients) CIK cell infusions on days 14 and 16 of the first and second chemotherapy cycles + Chemotherapy with Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin (CAPOX) Chemotherapy with XELOX The ORR and DCR were higher in the study group (ORR: 25% vs. 5.9%; DCR: 62.5% vs. 58.8%). The median PFS and OS were prolonged in the CIK group (5.6 and 13.9 months vs. 3.83 and 11 months, respectively), however, they were not significant (PFS: P = 0.06; OS: P = 0.27) No severe CIK-related toxicity was observed.…”
Section: Clinical Studies On Cik Cell Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%