2016
DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000004531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemotherapy plus bevacizumab versus chemotherapy plus cetuximab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Abstract: Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We included 16 studies on OS, with 11,094 participants. There were significant differences between the groups BEVA versus no BEVA [13, 42, 71, 73, 74, 77, 78, 8187] (MD = 4.07; 95% CI 1.69–6.45; p < 0.001; I 2 = 81%). However, when we look at the clusters of CT regimens separately, we note the following: there were no statistically significant differences between the subgroups of BEVA + CT versus CT alone [13, 71, 78, 82] (MD = 2.83; 95% CI − 1.76 to 7.41; p = 0.23; I 2 = 87%); BEVA + CT versus CETUX + CT [74, 77, 86, 87] (MD = − 0.52; 95% CI − 7.7 to 6.67; p = 0.89; I 2 = 0%) and BEVA + FOLFOX versus FOLFOX [13, 83] (MD = 8.63; 95% CI − 9.93 to 27.19; p = 0.36; I 2 = 96%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We included 16 studies on OS, with 11,094 participants. There were significant differences between the groups BEVA versus no BEVA [13, 42, 71, 73, 74, 77, 78, 8187] (MD = 4.07; 95% CI 1.69–6.45; p < 0.001; I 2 = 81%). However, when we look at the clusters of CT regimens separately, we note the following: there were no statistically significant differences between the subgroups of BEVA + CT versus CT alone [13, 71, 78, 82] (MD = 2.83; 95% CI − 1.76 to 7.41; p = 0.23; I 2 = 87%); BEVA + CT versus CETUX + CT [74, 77, 86, 87] (MD = − 0.52; 95% CI − 7.7 to 6.67; p = 0.89; I 2 = 0%) and BEVA + FOLFOX versus FOLFOX [13, 83] (MD = 8.63; 95% CI − 9.93 to 27.19; p = 0.36; I 2 = 96%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We included 19 studies with 9856 participants for BEVA versus no BEVA [13, 42, 7174, 7678, 8087, 90]. There was a significant difference in the subgroup with a quality of seven or more stars for patients treated with BEVA (MD = 4.52; 95% CI 3.26–7.10; p  < 0.00001) and a high statistical heterogeneity ( I 2  = 90%; p  = 0.0001) (see the electronic supplementary material, Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ese drugs, however, have functional limitations and very o en numerous side effects. For example, cetuximab is most of all used in patients with a nonmutated (wild type) KRAS gene [7,8]. Moreover, in the CRC treatment area, solutions of chemotherapy combined with hyperthermia are introduced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 3 , 4 ] The development of targeted anticancer agents, such as cetuximab and panitumumab, in the last few decades has effectively prolonged the survival rate of patients with CRC. [ 5 ] However, the survival rate and prognosis of patients with CRC are not ideal. Thus, it is essential to explore a novel biomarker for a more precise treatment of CRC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%