2002
DOI: 10.1188/02.cjon.94-102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting

Abstract: Nausea and vomiting (N&V) is among the most distressing side effects of chemotherapy, despite the development of more efficacious antiemetic agents. As many as 60% of patients who receive cancer chemotherapy experience some degree of N&V. However, the actual incidence is difficult to determine with accuracy because of the variety of drugs, doses, and health conditions of the patients who receive cancer treatments. This article examines the state of the science related to chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomitin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This shows that efficacy was significantly higher in the aprepitant 40 ⁄ 25 mg and 125 ⁄ 80 mg groups than in the standard therapy group (v 2 test [closed testing procedure]: P = 0.0053 and P = 0.0004, respectively) and highest in the aprepitant 125 ⁄ 80 mg group. The delayed phase efficacy (days 2-5) was similar to the overall phase efficacy (days [1][2][3][4][5], indicating that aprepitant is effective in the delayed phase when standard therapy is not very effective. In terms of safety, aprepitant was generally well tolerated in Japanese cancer patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This shows that efficacy was significantly higher in the aprepitant 40 ⁄ 25 mg and 125 ⁄ 80 mg groups than in the standard therapy group (v 2 test [closed testing procedure]: P = 0.0053 and P = 0.0004, respectively) and highest in the aprepitant 125 ⁄ 80 mg group. The delayed phase efficacy (days 2-5) was similar to the overall phase efficacy (days [1][2][3][4][5], indicating that aprepitant is effective in the delayed phase when standard therapy is not very effective. In terms of safety, aprepitant was generally well tolerated in Japanese cancer patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…This was a multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized, parallel comparative study and conducted in a total of 127 institutions in Japan. Patients who met all of the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria were allocated to the aprepitant 125 ⁄ 80 mg group (oral administration at a dose of 125 mg on day 1 and a dose of 80 mg on days 2-5), aprepitant 40 ⁄ 25 mg group (oral administration at a dose of 40 mg on day 1 and a dose of 25 mg on days [2][3][4][5] or the standard therapy group (oral administration of placebo on days [1][2][3][4][5]. Treatment assignment (dynamic allocation) was performed using a minimization method for balancing four factors (sex, presence or absence of at least one emetogenic antitumor agent used in combination with cisplatin, presence or absence of previous treatment with cisplatin, and institution) between the treatment and control groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nausea and vomiting: An estimated 60% of patients who receive chemotherapy as part of their treatment experience some degree of nausea and vomiting (Bender et al 2002). Several types of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) exist (Mitchell, 2006).…”
Section: Gastrointestinal Toxicitymentioning
confidence: 99%