1994
DOI: 10.1016/0020-7292(94)90609-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemotherapy and extended-field radiation therapy to para -aortic area in patients with histologically proven metastatic cervical cancer to para-aortic nodes: A phase II pilot study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our series, combined chemotherapy with irradiation proved to be a superior definitive therapy, compared with other reports. 13 A poor positive detection rate using computed tomography was noted in this study (Table 1). Only five out of 11 positive cases were predicted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…In our series, combined chemotherapy with irradiation proved to be a superior definitive therapy, compared with other reports. 13 A poor positive detection rate using computed tomography was noted in this study (Table 1). Only five out of 11 positive cases were predicted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The median number of harvested pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes in our surgical staging arm was 19 (1-70) and 17 (3-74), respectively, and the median number of pelvic and paraaortic lymph node metastases was 2.4 (0-24) and 1.3 (0-25), respectively [49] . Patients with para-aortic lymph node metastases of cervical cancer have a poorer prognosis, with a 5-year overall survival between 5 and 58% depending on nodal size, the number of involved lymph nodes, the achievement of debulking surgery, and adequate CRTx schemas [9,22,24,30,38,50,[52][53][54] . This wide range of survival data potentially reflects the detection methods used to indicate EFRT (also in the RTOG 7920 [55] and EORTC trials [39] of prophylactic para-aortic irradiation), which include CT, lymphoscintigram, PET-CT, surgical staging, and a combination of these approaches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although primary pelvic radiotherapy or radical hysterectomy is associated with good local control, many patients (up to 30%), particularly those with bulky stage I or II primary disease, have PALN disease and undergo failed treatment. 12,13 FDG-PET is a more sensitive method for detecting PALN involvement [14][15][16][17][18] and determining radiation field placement 19 compared with CT and MRI. Dual-phase imaging has been shown to increase the sensitivity of PALN detection.…”
Section: Paln Involvementmentioning
confidence: 99%