2016
DOI: 10.1039/c6ra17140k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemotaxonomic discrimination of lichen species using an infrared chalcogenide fibre optic sensor: a useful tool for on-field biosourcing

Abstract: Spectral analysis of lichen extracts obtained by MIR-FEWS permits to discriminate species and the identification of their major compounds. MIR-FEWS is a rapid, efficient and convenient tool for metabolic profiling.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data accumulated during the 20 th century was summarized in 1996 by Huneck and Yoshimura in their compendium “Identification of Lichen Substances”, comprising spectroscopic data for over 850 lichen chemicals, including TLC retardation factors, infra-red data, electron impact mass spectrometry signals, UV/visible spectra and NMR landmarks 24 . Even though a wide range of analytical techniques have been used to study lichen metabolites 2529 , the favoured approach among lichenologists remains TLC analysis 30–34 . Because of its accessibility, it is still widely used today along with spot test reactions when describing new lichen species to report the main identified metabolites 3538 .…”
Section: Background and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data accumulated during the 20 th century was summarized in 1996 by Huneck and Yoshimura in their compendium “Identification of Lichen Substances”, comprising spectroscopic data for over 850 lichen chemicals, including TLC retardation factors, infra-red data, electron impact mass spectrometry signals, UV/visible spectra and NMR landmarks 24 . Even though a wide range of analytical techniques have been used to study lichen metabolites 2529 , the favoured approach among lichenologists remains TLC analysis 30–34 . Because of its accessibility, it is still widely used today along with spot test reactions when describing new lichen species to report the main identified metabolites 3538 .…”
Section: Background and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most of these tests have some limits to distinguish minute differences between species [9]. Alternatively, study of lichen compounds by usual LC-MS techniques [10] or direct spectroscopic analysis [11][12][13][14][15][16][17] offers a helpful tool for chemotaxonomic determination of compounds and dereplication strategies [18,19]. Accurate techniques as UPLC-HRMS are now available to identify a number of compounds [20][21][22][23] but protocols are not still standardized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the process of chemotaxonomic discrimination analysis in lichen groups requires reinforcement with complementary techniques, such as the use of pigments derived from anthraquinone-type compounds in specimens of the family Teloschistaceae (Pyrenodesmia sensu lato) [58] and optical-sensor profiles for metabolic profiling in species of the genera Cladonia, Stereocaulon, Lichina, Collema and Peltigera [59]. In addition, advances in analytical chemistry and mass spectrometry have allowed for a greater specificity in the elaboration of bioactive compounds profiles, which, together with modern DNAsequencing techniques and the extension of morphological descriptions as a "polyphasic approach", provide objectivity in the delimitation of lichen species [60,61].…”
Section: Distance and Phylogenetic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%