1972
DOI: 10.1038/239500a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli analysed by Three-dimensional Tracking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

106
1,840
11
16

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,009 publications
(1,973 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
106
1,840
11
16
Order By: Relevance
“…3D tracking results of bacterial swimming motion indicate that their speed during the running states is nearly constant, but it drops significantly or almost to zero during the tumble states 27. Following from the linear force‐speed relation characterized by Stoke's law, we can conclude that the propulsive force of the running states is approximately constant, while the propulsive force is relatively negligible during the tumble states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…3D tracking results of bacterial swimming motion indicate that their speed during the running states is nearly constant, but it drops significantly or almost to zero during the tumble states 27. Following from the linear force‐speed relation characterized by Stoke's law, we can conclude that the propulsive force of the running states is approximately constant, while the propulsive force is relatively negligible during the tumble states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Instead, worms navigate a chemical gradient using temporal comparisons of encountered concentrations [73,74], similar to the mechanisms used in bacterial chemotaxis [75]. Worm movement on agar plates consists of periods of forward movement, punctuated by sudden turns or reversals that lead to changes in direction [76].…”
Section: Navigating Towards or Away From A Chemicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motion analysis involves reconstruction of bacterial paths from digitized video frames for quantitation of behavior. 22,23 This assay monitors chemokinetic rather than chemotactic activity as no gradient of attractant is established. It has the advan- tage that the behavior of individual cells can be followed rather than the bulk response of a population, and it is widely used to determine the response of bacteria to attractants and repellants.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%