Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences 2014
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-409548-9.09054-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemosynthesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is particularly important for microbial communities living in nutrient-rich environments such as the human gut. For microbial communities living in oligotrophic environments, the growth rates of bacteria and the assembly process of communities are relatively slow [64][65][66], if sources are from considerably different habitats (e.g., fecal samples from different animals) [67][68][69], and the impact of ecological dynamics on community-based MST might be relatively low [70] (which is consistent with our numerical results shown in Figure S1). But even in this case, interpreting the results of existing MST solvers should be done with great caution.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This is particularly important for microbial communities living in nutrient-rich environments such as the human gut. For microbial communities living in oligotrophic environments, the growth rates of bacteria and the assembly process of communities are relatively slow [64][65][66], if sources are from considerably different habitats (e.g., fecal samples from different animals) [67][68][69], and the impact of ecological dynamics on community-based MST might be relatively low [70] (which is consistent with our numerical results shown in Figure S1). But even in this case, interpreting the results of existing MST solvers should be done with great caution.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Episodical intrusion of dissolved O 2 in the deeper part of the redoxcline could therefore partly fuel aerobic NH4+ or H 2 S oxidation. However, in the absence of O 2 , it is widely assumed that prokaryotes use the thermodynamically most favourable electron acceptors available in waters (Enrich‐Prast et al ). NO3 is commonly the next most energetically favourable electron acceptor in many aquatic environments and it can be used in the anaerobic oxidation of H 2 S by chemoautotrophic bacteria such as many members of the Epsilonproteobacteria group ( Sulfurimonas , Sulfuricurvum ), among others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In modern aquatic environments, biosynthesis of organic matter is to a large extent carried out by algae and cyanobacteria through oxygenic photosynthesis. Other prokaryotes, however, have the ability to produce organic matter from CO 2 without the energy of sunlight, but using the energy generated by the oxidation of various reduced species (Enrich‐Prast et al ). These chemoautotrophic organisms greatly impact the biogeochemical cycles of diverse elements, such as carbon (C), nitrogen (N), and sulfur (S), especially in euxinic systems (Jost et al ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a) (Cory et al ). Chemoautotrophic processes, such as nitrification and sulfide oxidation, simultaneously consume O 2 and CO 2 (Enrich‐Prast et al ) (downward‐left shift in Fig. a) and can be an important CO 2 fixation process in lakes (Squires et al ).…”
Section: Drivers Of Dissolved O2 and Co2 Concentrations In Aquatic Ecosystemsmentioning
confidence: 99%