Chemosensory Event-Related Potentials in Response to Nasal Propylene Glycol Stimulation

Abstract

Propylene glycol, also denoted as 1.2 propanediol (C3H8O2), often serves as a solvent for dilution of olfactory stimuli. It is supposed to serve as a neutral substance and has been used in many behavioral and electrophysiological studies to dilute pure olfactory stimuli. However, the effect of propylene glycol on perception and on neuronal responses has hitherto never been studied. In this study we tested by means of a threshold test, whether a nasal propylene glycol stimulation is recognizable by humans. Participants were able to recognize propylene glycol at a threshold of 42% concentration and reported a slight cooling effect. In addition to the threshold test, we recorded electroencephalography (EEG) during nasal propylene glycol stimulation to study the neuronal processing of the stimulus. We used a flow olfactometer and stimulated 15 volunteers with three different concentrations of propylene glycol (40 trials each) and water as a control condition (40 trials). To evaluate the neuronal response, we analyzed the event-related potentials (ERPs) and power modulations. The task of the volunteers was to identify a change (olfactory, thermal, or tactile) in the continuous air flow generated by the flow olfactometer. The analysis of the ERPs showed that propylene glycol generates a clear P2 component, which was also visible in the frequency domain as an evoked power response in the theta-band. The source analysis of the P2 revealed a widespread involvement of brain regions, including the postcentral gyrus, the insula and adjacent operculum, the thalamus, and the cerebellum. Thus, it is possible that trigeminal stimulation can at least partly account for sensations and brain responses elicited by propylene glycol. Based on these results, we conclude that the use of high propylene glycol concentrations to dilute fragrances complicates the interpretation of presumed purely olfactory effects.

Pearl and pitfalls in brain functional analysis by event-related potentials: a narrative review by the Italian Psychophysiology and Cognitive Neuroscience Society on methodological limits and clinical reliability—part II

“…Further studies have also identified the central, parietal, and occipital centers as areas for olfactory identification and also as selectively recruited for visual image processes [18]. Human OERPs are applied not only in basic research but also clinically and for forensic purposes [19,20].…”

Chemosensory Event-Related Potentials and Power Spectrum Could Be a Possible Biomarker in 3M Syndrome Infants?

“…The children were in a relaxed condition, were in a post-prandial state (i.e., they had eaten about an hour before the EEG recording) [25] and were in a waking state [26]. The choice of the eucalyptol odorant, which has a mixed component both olfactory and trigeminal, allowed us to keep the children in arousal during the CSERPs recordings [27][28][29][30].…”

Chemosensory Event-related Potentials in 3M Syndrome Infants: An early Biomarker Based on EEG Signal Processing

“…The choice of the eucalyptol odorant, which has a mixed component both olfactory and trigeminal, allowed us to keep the children in arousal during the CSERP recordings. [33][34][35][36]…”