2010
DOI: 10.3892/ol_00000061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemosensitivity of lung cancer: Differences between the primary lesion and lymph node metastasis

Abstract: Abstract. In this study, chemosensitivity tests were performed on both primary lesions (Pls) and lymph node metastases (lMs) from surgically resected non-small cell lung cancer (nsclc). Differences between the results obtained were evaluated. operative specimens were obtained from 13 patients with nsclc [6 with squamous cell carcinoma (sQ) and 7 with adenocarcinoma (AD)] whose lymph nodes were confirmed to be positive for metastasis. Both the Pl and lM from the same patient were examined immediately after rese… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nanotherapy offers the possibility to improve metastatic disease treatment by increasing the concentrations and attaining controlled release of therapeutics in distant lesions ( Sanga et al, 2007 ; Farokhzad Omid and Langer, 2009 ; Misra et al, 2010 ; Bourzac, 2012 ; Parhi et al, 2012 ; Zamboni et al, 2012 ; Bertrand et al, 2014 ; Grodzinski and Farrell, 2014 ; Fernandes et al, 2015 ). Nanovectors (NV) can favorably change pharmacokinetics of drugs in plasma and in tissues, prolonging circulation time and enhancing delivery to tumors ( Bae et al, 2005 , 2007 ; Bae and Kataoka, 2009 ; Maniwa et al, 2010 ; Ponta and Bae, 2014 ; Khawar et al, 2015 ; Reichel et al, 2015 , 2017 ; Curtis et al, 2016b ; Khalid et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Drug-based Nanotherapy In Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nanotherapy offers the possibility to improve metastatic disease treatment by increasing the concentrations and attaining controlled release of therapeutics in distant lesions ( Sanga et al, 2007 ; Farokhzad Omid and Langer, 2009 ; Misra et al, 2010 ; Bourzac, 2012 ; Parhi et al, 2012 ; Zamboni et al, 2012 ; Bertrand et al, 2014 ; Grodzinski and Farrell, 2014 ; Fernandes et al, 2015 ). Nanovectors (NV) can favorably change pharmacokinetics of drugs in plasma and in tissues, prolonging circulation time and enhancing delivery to tumors ( Bae et al, 2005 , 2007 ; Bae and Kataoka, 2009 ; Maniwa et al, 2010 ; Ponta and Bae, 2014 ; Khawar et al, 2015 ; Reichel et al, 2015 , 2017 ; Curtis et al, 2016b ; Khalid et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Drug-based Nanotherapy In Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). Moreover, the inconsistency of chemotherapy sensitivity between the primary tumor and metastatic lymph nodes has also been reported in several other types of cancer, including lung cancer, gastric cancer, breast cancer, and colorectal cancer 21–25 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Moreover, the inconsistency of chemotherapy sensitivity between the primary tumor and metastatic lymph nodes has also been reported in several other types of cancer, including lung cancer, gastric cancer, breast cancer, and colorectal cancer. [21][22][23][24][25] It should be noted the influence of tumor volume reduction after IC on subsequent radiotherapy planning is also a key consideration in clinical practice. To evaluate whether the superiority of the GP regimen in GTVnx reduction can lead to advantages in radiotherapy planning, we compared the dosimetric parameters between the two treatment groups in the post-PSM cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, our group demonstrated how, in the case of certain anti-cancer drugs, few differences were observed between the chemosensitivity of the primary NSCLC tissue and the associated lymph node metastases ( 42 ). Several experimental studies have detected unexpected differences in chemosensitivity between primary and metastatic tumors ( 42 , 43 ). These results, and our previous data ( 17 , 42 ), appear to agree with the findings of the present study regarding nodal recurrence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%