2005
DOI: 10.3892/or.14.5.1177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemoradiotherapy for T3 and T4 squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus using low-dose FP and radiation: A preliminary report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall response rates with preoperative chemoradiotherapy (FP, 40-44 Gy) were reported to be higher than chemotherapy, 55.2%-74.4% [14,15], and pathological complete response (pCR) rates were 25%-28% [16][17][18]. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery is expected to improve local control, the curative resection rate, and the [19,20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Overall response rates with preoperative chemoradiotherapy (FP, 40-44 Gy) were reported to be higher than chemotherapy, 55.2%-74.4% [14,15], and pathological complete response (pCR) rates were 25%-28% [16][17][18]. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery is expected to improve local control, the curative resection rate, and the [19,20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…infusion on days 1 -5 (Figure 1). Radiation therapy was performed after CDDP infusion on days 1 -5 using a linear accelerator (Mevatron KD2; Siemens, Munich, Germany) and a previously described radiation method (Fujiwara et al, 2005). Chemotherapy was combined with radiation therapy during the first week, and then radiation therapy alone was repeated for the next 3 weeks (days 8 -12, 15 -19, and 22 -26).…”
Section: Patients and Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surgery is the treatment of choice for patients with locoregionally confined oesophageal cancer (stages II and III); however, the 5-year survival rate is less than 20%, even after curative surgery (Parkin et al, 2005). Since 1996, we have combined preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with radical surgery for the treatment of oesophageal cancers, and have reported increased resectability, a reduced incidence of both local recurrence and distant metastasis, and a better prognosis for CRT responders (Fujiwara et al, 2005). However, the benefits of CRT are controversial, and some clinical trials have shown that this preoperative strategy benefits only the 25% of patients who show a pathological complete response (CR; that is, no cancer cells in the resected specimen), whereas the remaining 75% present CRTresistant and highly aggressive cancers with lymph-node and distant metastases (Coia et al, 2000;Iyer et al, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has been accepted as a first-line therapy in the Unites States [4]. Since 1996, we have advocated a trimodal therapy, a combination of radical surgery with preoperative CRT, and have reported increased resectability, reduced incidence of both local recurrence and distant metastasis, and better clinical outcome for CRT responders [5]. However, the benefit of preoperative CRT over chemotherapy alone has not yet been established in Japan, and remains controversial in Europe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%