1969
DOI: 10.1080/09553006914550411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemoprotection against Three Modes of Radiation Death in the Mouse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0
1

Year Published

1970
1970
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the 30-day survival test, the modulation by the agent of the recovery and regeneration of the gastrointestinal epithelium and the haematopoietic progenitor cells in the bone marrow could be evaluated, which are two of the most radiosensitive organs essential for sustenance of the life [137,138] . The gastrointestinal (GI) syndrome in mice can be assessed by determining the survival up to 10 days (measure of GI death) after exposure of the animals to comparatively high doses of IR, whereas haematopoietic syndrome can be assessed by monitoring the survival of irradiated animals up to 30 days post-IR [137,139,[140][141][142] . The intestinal crypt cell assay or functional changes also serve as indicators of GI damage [143] .…”
Section: Strategies For and Challenge Of Ra Randdmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the 30-day survival test, the modulation by the agent of the recovery and regeneration of the gastrointestinal epithelium and the haematopoietic progenitor cells in the bone marrow could be evaluated, which are two of the most radiosensitive organs essential for sustenance of the life [137,138] . The gastrointestinal (GI) syndrome in mice can be assessed by determining the survival up to 10 days (measure of GI death) after exposure of the animals to comparatively high doses of IR, whereas haematopoietic syndrome can be assessed by monitoring the survival of irradiated animals up to 30 days post-IR [137,139,[140][141][142] . The intestinal crypt cell assay or functional changes also serve as indicators of GI damage [143] .…”
Section: Strategies For and Challenge Of Ra Randdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For an example, the survival lethal dose 50/30 (LD50/30), which is the exposure dose to IR that kills half of the exposed animals within 30 days, is often used to estimate the DRF of the RA by dividing the LD50/30 of the RA-treated group with the LD50/30 of the vehicle-treated group to quantify protection of the haematopoietic system [139,140] . The predominant laboratory animal used in the models of radiation syndrome for study of IR effects is the mouse due to the low cost, easy handling and ability to manipulate the phenotype and genotype [144,145] .…”
Section: Strategies For and Challenge Of Ra Randdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The haemoglobin, total leukocyte count and differential lymphocyte counts are studied in blood samples drawn from the hearts of mice sacrificed routinely to study the haematological effects of radiation (Yuhas and Storer, 1969;Lata et al, 2009). The animals in these studies are divided into two groups -control (radiation alone) and treated group (extract treated plus irradiated).…”
Section: Haematological Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In animal studies, the Dose Reduction Factor (DRF) is typically determined by irradiating mice with and without administrated radioprotective agents at a range of radiation doses and then comparing the end point of interest (e.g. 30-day survival) (Yuhas and Storer, 1969). The radioprotective efficacy of the extract is evaluated in the animal model by their pre-irradiation administration via different routes, such as intraperitoneal, intramuscular, intravenous and oral, for 15 consecutive days followed by whole body irradiation.…”
Section: Whole-body Survival Body Weight and Dose Reduction Factor (mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial interest was followed by disappointment because of the severe toxicity of these drugs in animals. During the search for more effective but less toxic protectors, WR-2721, a phosphoro-thioate derivative of cysteamine was found to be less toxic and much more effective than the parent compound (28). Similarly MPG, a synthetic thiol compound, has been reported to protect against radiation induced damage at a non-toxic optimal dose of 20 mg/kg body weight with a DRF of 1.4 (23).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%