1991
DOI: 10.1099/0022-1317-72-2-457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemoprophylaxis of scrapie in mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
61
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(23 reference statements)
1
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Effectiveness was clearly observed even for the infusion at a late stage of infection, when abnormal PrP deposition was already visible in the affected brain. PPS is known to be effective in inhibiting abnormal PrP formation in vitro (5) and/or in prolonging the disease incubation time in vivo (9,12,13,16). However, its effectiveness in vivo has been restricted to administration either before or soon after peripheral infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effectiveness was clearly observed even for the infusion at a late stage of infection, when abnormal PrP deposition was already visible in the affected brain. PPS is known to be effective in inhibiting abnormal PrP formation in vitro (5) and/or in prolonging the disease incubation time in vivo (9,12,13,16). However, its effectiveness in vivo has been restricted to administration either before or soon after peripheral infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, IgG Abs could enhance agent uptake into myeloid cells, which may in turn heighten agent replication (22,31). Chemoprophylaxis studies on scrapie similarly implicate a crucial role for myeloid cells in spreading peripheral infection (32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One class of molecules that has shown significant efficiency in the treatment of prion diseases is the class of sulfated polyanions, such as dextran sulfate 500 (DS500), pentosane polysulfate and suramin (Farquhar & Dickinson, 1986;Kimberlin & Walker, 1986;Ladogana et al, 1992;Caughey & Raymond, 1993;Beringue et al, 2000;Gilch et al, 2001). However, their use is limited by their toxicity, restricted efficiency and narrow window of intervention following infection (Diringer & Ehlers, 1991;Ladogana et al, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%