Skin cancers, especially keratinocyte carcinomas, constitute the most frequent cancer in white populations from Europe, the USA and Australia, 1 being sometimes referred to as an 'epidemic'. 2 European consensus-based guidelines and oncodermatology position statements have emphasized the role of dermatologists in the appropriate management of actinic keratoses (AKs), which precede most invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (cSCCs). 2,3 According to the landmark trial published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2019, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 5% cream is the most effective (and cost-effective) field-directed treatment for AK in immunocompetent patients. 4,5 AKs in organ transplant recipients (OTRs), excluded from these trials, are often confluent into areas of 'field cancerization', with an 80-fold increased risk of cSCC. As such, AKs from OTRs have been classified as the 'most severe' group of AK, requiring a specific approach. 3 In 2019, a systematic review published in the BJD concluded that there was 'surprisingly little evidence' on how best to treat AK in OTRs, and advocated for trials in this field, emphasizing the need for field cancerization approaches and long-term follow-up aiming to prevent cSCC. 6,7 In this issue of the BJD, Hasan et al. 8 bring a significant contribution to this field through the investigator-initiated SPOT (Squamous cell carcinoma Prevention in Organ transplant recipients using Topical treatments) trial, funded by the National Institute for Health Research (UK). This phase II, randomized, open trial first aimed to assess feasibility in OTRs, in terms of recruitment, completion of treatment and willingness to be re-treated. Forty OTRs with multiple AKs were randomized 1 : 1 : 1 to topical 5-FU, imiquimod 5% or sunscreen, applied according to routine clinical practice (one or two cycles were permitted for 5-FU and imiquimod) during a 3month treatment phase. Overall, the number of AKswhich combines AK clearance and new AK formationwas lower with 5-FU at each timepoint, including 12 months post-treatment. Patients' reported outcomes did not differ between groups, and high proportions of patients expressed willingness to be re-treated with the same regimen, suggesting the feasibility of repeated treatment courses.The SPOT trial fulfilled its primary objective by demonstrating the feasibility of such a trial among OTRs. The efficacy data should be considered cautiously (unblinded trial,