2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2017.03.077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemometric evaluation of the combined effect of temperature, pressure, and co-solvent fractions on the chiral separation of basic pharmaceuticals using actual vs set operational conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Variation of the modifier composition causes the changes in the mobile phase solvation strength, and variation of the modifier concentration is the main reason causing the changes of the analyte retention 10,65 . In most cases, increasing the modifier fraction reduces the analyte retention; however, if too much of the modifier is used, super(sub)critical conditions of the mobile phase cannot be maintained 66 …”
Section: Packed Column Supercritical Fluid Chromatographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variation of the modifier composition causes the changes in the mobile phase solvation strength, and variation of the modifier concentration is the main reason causing the changes of the analyte retention 10,65 . In most cases, increasing the modifier fraction reduces the analyte retention; however, if too much of the modifier is used, super(sub)critical conditions of the mobile phase cannot be maintained 66 …”
Section: Packed Column Supercritical Fluid Chromatographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of the nature and concentration of the alcohol modifier, the temperature and the structures of the analytes and selectors on retention and selectivity were studied. The problem of calculating the real operational conditions in SFC was also recently reported . In our case, for the sake of operational simplicity, only the numerical settings of the SFC system were varied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The possible effects of amines as mobile phase additives on the property and the thickness of the adsorbed layer formed on the surface of the stationary phase were also described . It was demonstrated that by applying a polysaccharide‐type CSP for the enantiomer separation of basic drugs, the NP retention and selectivity rules may not apply to SFC conditions due to the fundamentally different operational properties of the mobile phases .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that, because SFC uses supercritical fluids as the mobile phase, selectivity will differ from that of HPLC. The selectivity of SFC can be controlled by changing the mobile phase composition, temperature, and pressure [2,3,4,5,6], but the stationary phase most significantly affects selectivity. In addition to the number of stationary phases specially designed for SFC, stationary phases used in HPLC procedures are also used for SFC, making it is difficult to select the optimal stationary phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%