1998
DOI: 10.1007/s002489900060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemoautotrophic Microbial Mats in Submarine Caves with Hydrothermal Sulphidic Springs at Cape Palinuro, Italy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, the highest estimated rate of chemolithoautotrophic productivity from our study was Movile Cave (281 g C/m 2 /yr). This rate is comparable to those estimated from sulfidic springs at Cape Palinuro, Italy (378 g C/ m 2 /yr) (Mattison et al, 1998), as well as the hyporheic zone of Sycamore Creek, Arizona (333 g C/m 2 /yr) (Jones et al, 1994), and autotrophic productivity estimates from open oceans, continental shelves, and upwelling zones, as well as lakes and streams (Lieth, 1972;Kirchman et al, 1993).…”
Section: Productivity In Chemolithoautotrophic Subterranean Microbialsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically, the highest estimated rate of chemolithoautotrophic productivity from our study was Movile Cave (281 g C/m 2 /yr). This rate is comparable to those estimated from sulfidic springs at Cape Palinuro, Italy (378 g C/ m 2 /yr) (Mattison et al, 1998), as well as the hyporheic zone of Sycamore Creek, Arizona (333 g C/m 2 /yr) (Jones et al, 1994), and autotrophic productivity estimates from open oceans, continental shelves, and upwelling zones, as well as lakes and streams (Lieth, 1972;Kirchman et al, 1993).…”
Section: Productivity In Chemolithoautotrophic Subterranean Microbialsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…There have been relatively few studies delineating energy flow in cave and karst systems (e.g., Brown et al, 1994;Simon et al, 2001;Simon & Benfield, 2002;Simon et al, 2007), and even fewer investigations of ecosystem energetics from solely chemolithoautotrophically-based cave and karst ecosystems (e.g., Mattison et al, 1998;Porter, 1999). Most of the ecosystem studies from chemolithoautotrophic karst systems have been done using stable isotope ratio systematics for the purpose of delineating trophic relationships within the food web (e.g., Sarbu et al, 1996;Sarbu et al, 2000;Megan L. Porter, Annette Summers Engel, Thomas C. Kane, Brian K. Kinkle Vlasceanu et al, 2000;Engel, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…are large, filamentous, gliding, colorless sulfur bacteria and are known to occur worldwide in diverse habitats with a wide range of salinities. They form visible white mats on the surfaces of organic-rich freshwater sediments (39,46,63,64) and in sulfur springs (36), marine caves (37), marine eutrophic coastal zones (22,58,59), upwelling regions (7,15), whale falls (11), cold seeps (10,43,48), and gas seeps (4,28). These filamentous bacteria migrate in daily cycles in microbial mats (16,23,67).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hypogenic cave communities, devoid of any light and based on energy produced by chemoautotrophs, have been described in environments ranging from submarine caves in Italy to large caverns in Mexico (Bottrell et al 1991;Hose et al 2000;Mattison et al 1998;Sarbu et al 1996;Vlasceanu et al 2000). In each cave, microbial mats were observed in areas with high hydrogen sulfide concentrations, and sulfide oxidation to elemental sulfur or to sulfate is the energy source for carbon fixation into biomass.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In each cave, microbial mats were observed in areas with high hydrogen sulfide concentrations, and sulfide oxidation to elemental sulfur or to sulfate is the energy source for carbon fixation into biomass. Mats of sulfur-oxidizing bacteria can occur along the water-atmosphere interface in cave pools and streams (e.g., Hubbard et al 1986) or, more commonly, at the interface between the cave conduit and the limestone cave walls where sulfide-rich groundwater seeps through the bedrock (Mattison et al 1998). The biogeochemical reactions carried out by sulfur-oxidizing bacteria could have a significant effect on limestone dissolution and cave enlargement (Engel & Randall, 2011;Hose et al 2000;Macalady et al 2006;Sarbu et al 1996;Vlasceanu et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%