1988
DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/34.7.1447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemistry profiles in "wellness programs": test selection and participant outcomes.

Abstract: Insurers, employers, and individuals create demands for laboratory testing in "wellness programs." Tests chosen to identify cases deserving intervention included routine automated chemical tests plus high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, ferritin, and thyroid tests. Participants' unwarranted concerns were addressed with a personalized reporting schema. We tested 1338 individuals, identified 224 (16.7%) with significant abnormalities, and made phone contact follow-up with 193 (86%) of these six to 14 months lat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because males and females differ in both serum transaminases and lipid profiles [31] , we performed sub-group analyses comparing the associations between males and females. In general, the odds ratios in males tended to be larger than those in females at both low LDL-C (LDL-C ≤40, 41–70 mg/dL) and high HDL-C (HDL-C >100 mg/dL), but none of the gender differences reached statistical significance in formal tests of interaction (data not shown).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because males and females differ in both serum transaminases and lipid profiles [31] , we performed sub-group analyses comparing the associations between males and females. In general, the odds ratios in males tended to be larger than those in females at both low LDL-C (LDL-C ≤40, 41–70 mg/dL) and high HDL-C (HDL-C >100 mg/dL), but none of the gender differences reached statistical significance in formal tests of interaction (data not shown).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, female transaminase levels are generally lower than males [31] , so we performed a sensitivity analysis using a gender-specific ALT cutoff (47 U/L for male, 30 U/L for female) and AST cutoff of 33 U/L, the thresholds NHANES recommends [27] . An LDL-C less than 40 mg/dL was associated with an odds ratio of 3.3 (95% CI 1.9–5.8, p<0.001) for abnormal liver enzymes, although LDL-C between 41 and 70 mg/dL was not (adjusted odds ratio 1.2; 95% CI 0.8–1.8, p = 0.3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%