Histamine II and Anti-Histaminics 1978
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-66445-8_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemistry of Anti-H1 Histamine Antagonists

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1983
1983
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result seems reasonable when one considers that receptor recognition and differentiation of the two aromatic features of the ligand must be the chief factor responsible for affinity differences between isomers (in many antihistamines, e.g., diphenhydramine, the two aryl groups are identical). 22 The more extreme the difference in aromatic character, e.g., homo vs heteroaryl or homoaryl, the greater is the degree of receptor discrimination between the two aromatic features that is to be expected. An additional factor contributing to the lower antipodal activity ratios of the chiral diphenhydramines as compared with pheniramines may be the greater conformational flexibility of the former class, which results from the ether linkage which extends the distance between the benzylic centre and alkylamino side chain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This result seems reasonable when one considers that receptor recognition and differentiation of the two aromatic features of the ligand must be the chief factor responsible for affinity differences between isomers (in many antihistamines, e.g., diphenhydramine, the two aryl groups are identical). 22 The more extreme the difference in aromatic character, e.g., homo vs heteroaryl or homoaryl, the greater is the degree of receptor discrimination between the two aromatic features that is to be expected. An additional factor contributing to the lower antipodal activity ratios of the chiral diphenhydramines as compared with pheniramines may be the greater conformational flexibility of the former class, which results from the ether linkage which extends the distance between the benzylic centre and alkylamino side chain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The E: Z potency ratio of 600 after a 15-45 min contact time compares favourably with the reported value of 1 170 (Ison et al 1973) when allowance is made for variations in the experimental conditions, and confirms the high degree of selectivity of the H I receptor for triprolidine over its Z-analogue. This ratio exceeds that exhibited towards related E/Z pairs of aminopropenes by up to two orders of magnitude (Casy 1978). It is of interest that optical antipodes of chlorpheniramine, a reduced analogue of triprolidine, exhibit a similar ratio of activity (608) under the same experimental conditions (Mercer 1989).…”
Section: Compoundmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Cyproheptadine, a widely known anti-5-hydroxytryptamine and anti-histamine agent (Casy, 1978), has been shown to depress the electrical excitability of nerves (Riccioppo Neto, 1979) and smooth muscle cells (Lowe, Matthews & Richardson, 1981). Whereas the local anaesthetic effect in nerve seems to be due to a blockade of sodium channels, the action of cyproheptadine in smooth muscle probably involves inhibition of the transmembrane calcium current through slow channels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%