2002
DOI: 10.1002/chin.200222235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ChemInform Abstract: Validation of Structural Proposals by Substructure Analysis and 13C NMR Chemical Shift Prediction.

Abstract: ChemInform is a weekly Abstracting Service, delivering concise information at a glance that was extracted from about 100 leading journals. To access a ChemInform Abstract of an article which was published elsewhere, please select a “Full Text” option. The original article is trackable via the “References” option.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The complete amino acid sequence of NRC1 was used to delineate protein domains with the domain linker predictor (Miyazaki et al ., ), whereas motifs and patterns were assessed with pfam (Finn et al ., ) and Prosite (Sigrist et al ., ). Overall, the prediction of the secondary structure was based on the consensus of several secondary structure prediction methods: gor iv (Garnier et al ., ), hnn (Guermeur & Gallinari, ), sopma (Geourjon & Deleage, ), porter (Pollastri & McLysaght, ), jpred (Cole et al ., ), psipred (Buchan et al ., ), jufo (Meiler et al ., ), sspro (Cheng et al ., ) and sspro8 (Pollastri & Baldi, ). Propensities of the three aspects of intrinsic disorder – coils, missing coordinates and a high B‐factor – were assessed with disembl (Linding et al ., ), iupred (Dosztányi et al ., ) and disopred (Ward et al ., ) and translated into a disorder score for each amino acid position in the sequence.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complete amino acid sequence of NRC1 was used to delineate protein domains with the domain linker predictor (Miyazaki et al ., ), whereas motifs and patterns were assessed with pfam (Finn et al ., ) and Prosite (Sigrist et al ., ). Overall, the prediction of the secondary structure was based on the consensus of several secondary structure prediction methods: gor iv (Garnier et al ., ), hnn (Guermeur & Gallinari, ), sopma (Geourjon & Deleage, ), porter (Pollastri & McLysaght, ), jpred (Cole et al ., ), psipred (Buchan et al ., ), jufo (Meiler et al ., ), sspro (Cheng et al ., ) and sspro8 (Pollastri & Baldi, ). Propensities of the three aspects of intrinsic disorder – coils, missing coordinates and a high B‐factor – were assessed with disembl (Linding et al ., ), iupred (Dosztányi et al ., ) and disopred (Ward et al ., ) and translated into a disorder score for each amino acid position in the sequence.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%