1989
DOI: 10.1002/chin.198917303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ChemInform Abstract: Temperature Dependence of the Photoinduced Disproportionation of Ru(bpy)2+ 3 on Porous Vycor Glass.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be an electrostatic effect mediated by increased negative charge density at the substrate surface via the BPDC SAM layer. Electrostatic interactions of this type are not uncommon between RuBPY and metal oxides such as SnO 2 , TiO 2 , and SiO 2 . ,,, Interestingly, the effect appears to be more pronounced on glass relative to FTO when taking into account the inability to produce less than 10 m m doped films on glass. This would imply a higher anionic surface charge density lending to increased localized RuDCBPY concentrations at the glass substrate surface relative to FTO.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This may be an electrostatic effect mediated by increased negative charge density at the substrate surface via the BPDC SAM layer. Electrostatic interactions of this type are not uncommon between RuBPY and metal oxides such as SnO 2 , TiO 2 , and SiO 2 . ,,, Interestingly, the effect appears to be more pronounced on glass relative to FTO when taking into account the inability to produce less than 10 m m doped films on glass. This would imply a higher anionic surface charge density lending to increased localized RuDCBPY concentrations at the glass substrate surface relative to FTO.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrostatic interactions of this type are not uncommon between RuBPY and metal oxides such as SnO 2 , TiO 2 , and SiO 2 . 83,84,112,113 Interestingly, the effect appears to be more pronounced on glass relative to FTO when taking into account the inability to produce less than 10 mm doped films on glass. This would imply a higher anionic surface charge density lending to increased localized RuDCBPY…”
Section: Table 1 Summary Of the Fluorescence Lifetime Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 1985;Wheeler and Thomas, 1982;Willner er al., 1981;Zawadzki et al, 1986). Gafney and his coworkers (Shi et al, 1985;Kennelly et al, 1985;Fan et al, 1989) those in aqueous solution. Lack of self-quenching at close to monolayer coverages indicated an absence of surface mobility of Ru(bpy)$+ in the adsorbed state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%