2008
DOI: 10.1002/chin.200834222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ChemInform Abstract: Synthesis of New Quinolone Antibiotics Utilizing Azetidine Derivatives Obtained from 1‐Azabicyclo[1.1.0]butane.

Abstract: Ring-opening reactions of azabicyclobutane (II) with thiols or aromatic amines (I) provide access to sulfenylazetidines and aminoazetidines (III). Introducing azetidine derivatives into fluoroquinolonecarboxylic acid (IV) affords the corresponding fluoroquinolone antibiotics. Most of the fluoroquinolones reveal more potent activity profiles vs. Gram-positive bacteria than Gram-negative bacteria. Especially compounds (V) show fairly potent activity against methicillin-resistant S. aureus in comparison with that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A series of 3‐sulfenylazetidine quinolone hybrids were assessed for their in vitro antibacterial activities against representative clinically Gram‐positive and Gram‐negative pathogens by Nagao et al . Among them, the 1,2,4‐triazole conjugate 2 (MIC: 0.125–8 μg/mL) exhibited considerable potency in inhibiting the growth of Gram‐positive strains including methicillin‐sensitive S. aureus /MSSA and methicillin‐resistant S. aureus /MRSA, which was as potent as or more active than levofloxacin.…”
Section: Antibacterial Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A series of 3‐sulfenylazetidine quinolone hybrids were assessed for their in vitro antibacterial activities against representative clinically Gram‐positive and Gram‐negative pathogens by Nagao et al . Among them, the 1,2,4‐triazole conjugate 2 (MIC: 0.125–8 μg/mL) exhibited considerable potency in inhibiting the growth of Gram‐positive strains including methicillin‐sensitive S. aureus /MSSA and methicillin‐resistant S. aureus /MRSA, which was as potent as or more active than levofloxacin.…”
Section: Antibacterial Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%