2008
DOI: 10.1002/chin.200829203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ChemInform Abstract: A Comparison of Field‐Based Similarity Searching Methods: CatShape, FBSS, and ROCS.

Abstract: Computers in chemistry V 0380 A Comparison of Field-Based Similarity Searching Methods: CatShape, FBSS, and ROCS. -(MOFFAT, K.; GILLET*, V. J.; WHITTLE, M.; BRAVI, G.; LEACH, A. R.; J. Chem. Inf. Model. (J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci.) 48 (2008) 4, 719-729; Dep. Inf. Stud., Univ. Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK; Eng.) -Lindner 29-203

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The conformational flexibility of training ligands is modeled by creating multiple conformers that cover a specified energy range for each input molecule [12,18,23e25,29e32]. CATALYST pharmacophores with exclusion constraints have been used as 3D queries for database searching and in 3D-QSAR studies [32,33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conformational flexibility of training ligands is modeled by creating multiple conformers that cover a specified energy range for each input molecule [12,18,23e25,29e32]. CATALYST pharmacophores with exclusion constraints have been used as 3D queries for database searching and in 3D-QSAR studies [32,33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%