1998
DOI: 10.1021/jf9804342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemiluminescent Methods in Alcoholic Beverage Analysis

Abstract: Chemiluminescent (CL) techniques employed in alcoholic beverage analysis are summarized. Specific applications to wine, beer, brandy, and tequila are described, and the determination of sulfur compounds, phosphate, L-malate, glycerol, fatty acids, phenolic compounds, and urate is included. Possibilities and limitations of the various CL detection systems are evaluated.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…18 Additionally, CL has proved to be a useful phenomenon in the laboratory, finding ever increasing applications in analytical chemistry for its high sensitivity, wide linear range, simple instrumentation, and lack of background scattering light interference. 19 The classical reagents, such as luminol, lucigenin, peroxalate, potassium permanganate, and Ce (IV) have been widely studied and employed in analytical chemistry due to their highly CL intensity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 Additionally, CL has proved to be a useful phenomenon in the laboratory, finding ever increasing applications in analytical chemistry for its high sensitivity, wide linear range, simple instrumentation, and lack of background scattering light interference. 19 The classical reagents, such as luminol, lucigenin, peroxalate, potassium permanganate, and Ce (IV) have been widely studied and employed in analytical chemistry due to their highly CL intensity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors try to fill a gap in this field of applied analytical chemistry as there are no recent reviews about the advances in analytical methods for determining the most typical enological parameters as done for traditional methods in the books from or and the compilation of the different official national and international regulations (EEC, 1989). Some previous reviews within the last ten years have been devoted to groups of analytes (Wagner et al, 1992a;Mateo and Jiménez, 2000; Vereda-Alonso et al, 2000;Scollary, 1997;Rapp and Versini, 1996) or techniques involved in the methods (Luque de Castro and Luque-Garcia, 2000;Cserhati et al, 2000;Navas and Jiménez, 1999; Wagner et al, 1992b;Baluja-Santos and González-Portal, 1992; Dell'Oro, 1991). They have not given an overall scope of the state-of-the-art of analytical methods in this field.…”
Section: Abstract Parameters Official Methods Usual Methods Non Chmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differentiation between brandies and wine distillates has been achieved and reported through luminescence (Tothova et al, 2009). Thus, it can be claimed that multivariate data analysis has played a good rule jointly with chromatographic and spectroscopic methods when applied to food products, in particular, for alcoholic beverages (Barbosa Garcia et al, 2007;Edelmann et al, 2001;Mattarucci et al, 2010;Navas & Jimenez 1999;Savchuk et al, 2001). On the other hand, with UV-Vis spectroscopy table wines have also been classified and differentiated (Urbano et al, 2006) and the authentication of whiskeys through absorption spectroscopy has been reported (MacKenzie & Aylott, 2004).…”
Section: Fluorescence and Uv-vis Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%