1970
DOI: 10.1016/0003-2697(70)90359-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemiluminescence in liquid scintillation counting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The conversion of counts per minute (cpm) to disintegrations per minute (dpm) is subject to artifacts such as uneven quenching of the scintillation, instrument drift, variability of automatic quench corrections, and chemiluminescence (59,62,74). At present, very few investigators use internal standardization that involves (a) multiple counting of samples until stabilization of the cpm, (b) careful pipetting of an internal standard of [ 14 C]-or [ 3 H]toluene into the scintillation vial, (c) multiple recounting of the samples, (d ) computing the counting efficiency of each sample, and (e) using the counting efficiency to convert cpm to dpm (19,22,26).…”
Section: Simulation Of the Impact Of Measurement Errors On Rates Of Gmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conversion of counts per minute (cpm) to disintegrations per minute (dpm) is subject to artifacts such as uneven quenching of the scintillation, instrument drift, variability of automatic quench corrections, and chemiluminescence (59,62,74). At present, very few investigators use internal standardization that involves (a) multiple counting of samples until stabilization of the cpm, (b) careful pipetting of an internal standard of [ 14 C]-or [ 3 H]toluene into the scintillation vial, (c) multiple recounting of the samples, (d ) computing the counting efficiency of each sample, and (e) using the counting efficiency to convert cpm to dpm (19,22,26).…”
Section: Simulation Of the Impact Of Measurement Errors On Rates Of Gmentioning
confidence: 99%