2013
DOI: 10.1039/c2ta00396a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemically tailoring the nanostructure of graphenenanosheets to confine sulfur for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries

Abstract: The commercialization of lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries has so far been limited by their rapid capacity fading, which is induced by dissolution of intermediate polysulfides and the pulverization of the sulfur cathode due to volume expansion. Herein, we reported an efficient strategy to confine active sulfur in chemically tailored graphene nanosheets, which were prepared via modified chemical activation of hydrothermal reduced graphene oxide hydrogels. Due to its high specific surface area, large pore volume, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
126
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(52 reference statements)
1
126
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, one of the main mechanisms for capacity fade is associated with the shuttling process. Consequently, devising ways to prevent the polysulfide shuttling process through the use of additives, 19 modification of the cathode structure, [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] modification of the electrolyte, 33,34 and by other methods [35][36][37] has been the focus of the recent research efforts in the area of lithium-sulfur batteries.…”
Section: Summary Of Technical Challenges With Lithium-sulfur Batteries-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, one of the main mechanisms for capacity fade is associated with the shuttling process. Consequently, devising ways to prevent the polysulfide shuttling process through the use of additives, 19 modification of the cathode structure, [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] modification of the electrolyte, 33,34 and by other methods [35][36][37] has been the focus of the recent research efforts in the area of lithium-sulfur batteries.…”
Section: Summary Of Technical Challenges With Lithium-sulfur Batteries-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 shows the CV curves of S/PPy cathode between 1.5 V and 3 V vs. Li þ /Li for initial two cycles at a scan rate of 0.1 mV s À1 . The sharp redox peaks with stable overlapping features confirm high reversibility and an excellent stability of the composite electrode upon operation in lithium battery [28]. In the cathodic (reduction) sweep, the peaks at 2.4 and 2.0 V can be observed, which are assigned to the reduction of element sulfur (S 8 ) to soluble lithium polysulfides (Li 2 S n , 4 n 8) and further conversion of these lithium polysulfides into insoluble Li 2 S 2 and Li 2 S, respectively [29].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Three peaks positioned at 288.3, 284.9, and 283.7 eV are observed from the C1s spectrum, which could be attributed to the C=O, C-O, and C=C/C-C groups [34,35], respectively, indicating that C still retains some oxygen-containing groups from the carbonization process of the carbon precursor. The S 2p spectrum exhibits two peaks at 164.8 and 163.7 eV, corresponding to the resolved S 2p 1/2 and S 2p 3/2 peaks.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%