2018
DOI: 10.3171/2017.2.jns162040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in neurosurgical patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Based on moderate-to-good quality of evidence, chemoprophylaxis is beneficial in preventing VTE, with no significant increase in either major or minor bleeding complications in patients undergoing cranial and spinal procedures. Further research is needed to determine whether this conclusion holds true for more specific subpopulations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
13

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
37
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…They found this aggressive protocol for early VTE prophylaxis after spine surgery decreased VTE incidence without increasing morbidity . A recent meta‐analysis drew a similar conclusion . However, the catastrophic morbidity of a symptomatic postoperative epidural hematoma remains a substantial disincentive for surgeons to initiate chemoprophylaxis after spinal surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…They found this aggressive protocol for early VTE prophylaxis after spine surgery decreased VTE incidence without increasing morbidity . A recent meta‐analysis drew a similar conclusion . However, the catastrophic morbidity of a symptomatic postoperative epidural hematoma remains a substantial disincentive for surgeons to initiate chemoprophylaxis after spinal surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Khan et al found a significant reduction in DVT with LMWH/UR (OR 0.51, 95% CI, 0.37–0.71; P < .0001.) . They did not find any significant increase in major intracranial hemorrhage ( P = .60), major extracranial hemorrhage ( P = .98), or minor bleeding complications ( P = .60) .…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 82%
“…They did not find any significant increase in major intracranial hemorrhage ( P = .60), major extracranial hemorrhage ( P = .98), or minor bleeding complications ( P = .60) . Additionally, in most of these studies, LMWH/UH was started preoperatively and continued post‐operatively while hospitalized . This is the strongest evidence to date arguing for chemoprophylaxis in the neurosurgical population.…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There have been various systematic reviews in the last two decades on the topic of efficacy of thromboprophylaxis to include pharmacological methods in addition to the widely prevalent mechanical modalities. 6 Various subsets of neurological injury are relevant in present day neurocritical care (►Table 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%