2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41570-021-00275-4
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical targets to deactivate biological and chemical toxins using surfaces and fabrics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
64
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
(81 reference statements)
0
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the complex and turbulent international situation in contemporary society, chemical warfare agents (CWAs) remain pose huge and acute threats to ecological environment, agriculture and human health despite being explicitly banned decades ago by the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons. Recent incidents in Syria and Malaysia have attracted renewed interest in novel materials for rapidly neutralizing and degrading these deadly agents that exist in liquid and aerosol forms. To date, apart from the impermeable encapsulated protective barriers with built-in breathing apparatus for personnel protection, activated carbon and its modified compounds have been the most exclusively used sorbents in filters to prevent accidental inhalation of CWAs. , However, these carbon-based materials still suffer from poor sorption capacity, secondary pollution after saturation, and high-cost ultimate disposal, which limit their practical application in the long run. , Thus, it is imperative to develop multifunctional chemical protective materials not only with appealing adsorptive capability but with the ability to decompose lethal chemical toxins into less toxic or nontoxic ones.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the complex and turbulent international situation in contemporary society, chemical warfare agents (CWAs) remain pose huge and acute threats to ecological environment, agriculture and human health despite being explicitly banned decades ago by the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons. Recent incidents in Syria and Malaysia have attracted renewed interest in novel materials for rapidly neutralizing and degrading these deadly agents that exist in liquid and aerosol forms. To date, apart from the impermeable encapsulated protective barriers with built-in breathing apparatus for personnel protection, activated carbon and its modified compounds have been the most exclusively used sorbents in filters to prevent accidental inhalation of CWAs. , However, these carbon-based materials still suffer from poor sorption capacity, secondary pollution after saturation, and high-cost ultimate disposal, which limit their practical application in the long run. , Thus, it is imperative to develop multifunctional chemical protective materials not only with appealing adsorptive capability but with the ability to decompose lethal chemical toxins into less toxic or nontoxic ones.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the fluorescence intensity of 1 + DCP gradually decreased with time (Figures b and S16b). Such observations indicate hydrolysis of the phosphorylated intermediate in aqueous medium with concurrent release of the less-toxic organophosphate end product. The comparison studies indicate the formation of protonated species ( 1H + ) in the reaction medium (Figure S17a).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, a selective oxidation must be done in order to avoid the formation of harmful by-products, such as in the case of over-oxidation, where there can be a formation of bis(2-chloroethyl) sulfoxide, which has very similar health issues to the ones linked with sulfur mustard gas [52]. Finally, according to Jabbour et al [53], hydrophobic metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) with the use of amphiphilic catalysts are preferred for the removal of sulfur mustard gas and its stimulants from water. 4.6.5.…”
Section: Sulfur Mustard Agents Detoxificationmentioning
confidence: 99%