2012
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical shift‐based water/fat separation in the presence of susceptibility‐induced fat resonance shift

Abstract: Chemical shift-based water/fat separation methods have been emerging due to the growing clinical need for fat quantification in different body organs. Accurate quantification of proton-density fat fraction requires the assessment of many confounding factors, including the need of modeling the presence of multiple peaks in the fat spectrum. Most recent quantitative chemical shift-based water/fat separation approaches rely on a multi-peak fat spectrum with pre-calibrated peak locations and pre-calibrated or self… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
37
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(75 reference statements)
3
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accurate fat quantification in chemical shift‐based water‐fat separation can also be influenced by other factors such as the difference in T1 values between fat and water (which itself is dependent on the fat/water fraction in a particular voxel) if the images are T1‐weighted (). By choosing a low flip angle and a long TR in this study, T1 effects were minimized ().…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate fat quantification in chemical shift‐based water‐fat separation can also be influenced by other factors such as the difference in T1 values between fat and water (which itself is dependent on the fat/water fraction in a particular voxel) if the images are T1‐weighted (). By choosing a low flip angle and a long TR in this study, T1 effects were minimized ().…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A limitation of this study was the use of a long initial TE and only two subsequent echoes acquired for fat–water discrimination. Consequently, the analysis of the imaging data is complicated by the effects of susceptibility on lipid chemical shift , T 2 * , and noise bias . This could potentially explain the larger variability at low FFs, especially in the 5‐degree MRI acquisitions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean bone marrow fat spectra have been also derived from constrained peak fitting of single‐voxel MRS measurements in bone marrow of the spine and the proximal femur . Susceptibility‐induced fat resonance shift effects have not been reported in bone marrow applications. Second, T 1 bias effects can be corrected using estimated T 1 values and flip angle mapping techniques .…”
Section: Technical Aspects Of Quantitative Bone Marrow Mri and Mrsmentioning
confidence: 99%