2018
DOI: 10.1002/2017gl075720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical Reactions Between Fe and H2O up to Megabar Pressures and Implications for Water Storage in the Earth's Mantle and Core

Liang Yuan,
Eiji Ohtani,
Daijo Ikuta
et al.

Abstract: We investigated the phase relations of the Fe‐H2O system at high pressures based on in situ X‐ray diffraction experiments and first‐principles calculations and demonstrate that FeHx and FeO are present at pressures less than ~78 GPa. A recently reported pyrite‐structured FeO2 was identified in the Fe‐H2O system at pressures greater than ~78 GPa after laser heating. The phase observed in this study has a unit cell volume 8%–11% larger than that of FeO2, produced in the Fe‐O binary system reported previously, su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
42
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
6
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also suggested that pyrite‐type FeOOH may result from the reaction between Fe and H 2 O at the core‐mantle boundary because this structure is stable at pressures above 80 GPa in FeOOH (e.g., Liu et al, ; Mao et al, ; Nishi et al, ; Ohtani et al, ; Yuan et al, ). AlOOH and FeOOH likely form a solid solution in the pyrite‐type structure because recent theoretical studies indicated that pyrite‐type AlOOH stabilizes at high pressures (Tsuchiya & Tsuchiya, ; Verma et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also suggested that pyrite‐type FeOOH may result from the reaction between Fe and H 2 O at the core‐mantle boundary because this structure is stable at pressures above 80 GPa in FeOOH (e.g., Liu et al, ; Mao et al, ; Nishi et al, ; Ohtani et al, ; Yuan et al, ). AlOOH and FeOOH likely form a solid solution in the pyrite‐type structure because recent theoretical studies indicated that pyrite‐type AlOOH stabilizes at high pressures (Tsuchiya & Tsuchiya, ; Verma et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, other contexts than subduction generate a broad geophysical interest for studying the Fe-O-H system at high pressure. Reaction of these deep hydrous melt with the metallic iron-rich lower mantle material (Frost et al, 2004) may produce FeO 2 H x in the lower mantle (Yuan et al, 2018). Iron hydride FeH x indeed satisfies density and sound velocities constraints in the Earth's core (e.g., Tagawa et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…However, crystalline-bounded water almost certainly survive shallow subduction and is recycled to large depth, particularly in cold slabs (Van Keken et al, 2011). Pyrite-structured FeO 2 H x was indeed reported to result from the reaction of water with metallic iron Mao et al, 2017;Yuan et al, 2018), a reaction that may have taken place during core formation resulting in the delivery of hydrogen to the Earth's core (Yuan et al, 2018). Moreover, other contexts than subduction generate a broad geophysical interest for studying the Fe-O-H system at high pressure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comparison between the melting temperatures of FeO 2 and FeO 2 H with mantle geotherms together with high‐pressure experiments (e.g., Liu et al, ; Yuan et al, ) suggests that P phase is thermally stable (not melted) in most of the mantle (Anderson, , ; Brown & Shankland, ). However, this may not be the case in the lowermost mantle and within the thermal boundary layer right above the CMB where mantle temperatures drastically increase by 1,000–1,400 K within less than 200 km estimated from mantle adiabat and the melting temperature of core materials at CMB conditions (Anderson, ; Anzellini et al, ; Morard et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%