2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2012.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical processes monitoring based on weighted principal component analysis and its application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Tennessee Eastman process simulation was developed by Downs and Vogel (1993) 25,26 , which simulates industrial processes containing both non-Gaussian and nonlinear features. As a benchmark simulation, the TE process has been widely used to test the performance of various monitoring approaches.…”
Section: Fault Detection In the Tennessee Eastman Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Tennessee Eastman process simulation was developed by Downs and Vogel (1993) 25,26 , which simulates industrial processes containing both non-Gaussian and nonlinear features. As a benchmark simulation, the TE process has been widely used to test the performance of various monitoring approaches.…”
Section: Fault Detection In the Tennessee Eastman Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrarily, if h is too small, sharp peaks will be positioned at the sample points in the density estimator. The number of data points, the data distribution, the choice of the kernel function, and other several factors decide the optimal choice of h. Various approaches on the choice of h have been reported, in which a proper empirical value for each specific case is suggested Jiang and Yan (2012), Jiang et al (2013), Scott (1992), Webb et al (2011).…”
Section: Kernel Density Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the the monitoring plots of different cases, as well as the ℝOC curves plotted in Figure 14 and Figure 18, it is concluded that the monitoring performance of SPCS usinng T 2 statistic is the best. In order to give a more comprehensive comparison, PCA, WPCA (weighted principal component analysis) Jiang and Yan (2012), SPCA (senstive principal component analysis) Jiang et al (2013) and we propsoed SPCS are performed on each case from Fault 1 to Fault 21. We selected 27 PCs for PCA according to CPV≥85% and set Card(β)=27 for SPCS.…”
Section: Fault Detection and Diagnosis With Spcs In The Tementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, for a certain KPC, fault information that is quite different from the others and the KPCs are not of equal importance. If the information is relatively limited, then the useful KPCs could be suppressed by the useless ones, thus submerging the useful information [15], [16]. Therefore, adapting covariance matrix to different classes of information is necessary.…”
Section: A Weighting Matrix Based On Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%