“…The Tennessee Eastman process simulation was developed by Downs and Vogel (1993) 25,26 , which simulates industrial processes containing both non-Gaussian and nonlinear features. As a benchmark simulation, the TE process has been widely used to test the performance of various monitoring approaches.…”
Section: Fault Detection In the Tennessee Eastman Processmentioning
“…The Tennessee Eastman process simulation was developed by Downs and Vogel (1993) 25,26 , which simulates industrial processes containing both non-Gaussian and nonlinear features. As a benchmark simulation, the TE process has been widely used to test the performance of various monitoring approaches.…”
Section: Fault Detection In the Tennessee Eastman Processmentioning
“…Contrarily, if h is too small, sharp peaks will be positioned at the sample points in the density estimator. The number of data points, the data distribution, the choice of the kernel function, and other several factors decide the optimal choice of h. Various approaches on the choice of h have been reported, in which a proper empirical value for each specific case is suggested Jiang and Yan (2012), Jiang et al (2013), Scott (1992), Webb et al (2011).…”
Section: Kernel Density Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the the monitoring plots of different cases, as well as the ℝOC curves plotted in Figure 14 and Figure 18, it is concluded that the monitoring performance of SPCS usinng T 2 statistic is the best. In order to give a more comprehensive comparison, PCA, WPCA (weighted principal component analysis) Jiang and Yan (2012), SPCA (senstive principal component analysis) Jiang et al (2013) and we propsoed SPCS are performed on each case from Fault 1 to Fault 21. We selected 27 PCs for PCA according to CPV≥85% and set Card(β)=27 for SPCS.…”
Section: Fault Detection and Diagnosis With Spcs In The Tementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many algorithms for selecting principal components have been put forward, such as, cumulative percent variance (CPV) Jiang and Yan (2012), variance of reconstruction error (VℝE) Lu et al (2004) and cross validation (CV) Diana and Tommasi (2002). CPV selects the first several PCs that represent the major variance information of original data.…”
“…However, for a certain KPC, fault information that is quite different from the others and the KPCs are not of equal importance. If the information is relatively limited, then the useful KPCs could be suppressed by the useless ones, thus submerging the useful information [15], [16]. Therefore, adapting covariance matrix to different classes of information is necessary.…”
Section: A Weighting Matrix Based On Sensitivity Analysismentioning
Fault detection is the research focus and priority in this study to ensure the high reliability of a proposed three-level inverter. Kernel principal component analysis (KPCA) has been widely used for feature extraction because of its simplicity. However, highlighting useful information that may be hidden under retained KPCs remains a problem. A weighted KPCA is proposed to overcome this shortcoming. Variable contribution plots are constructed to evaluate the importance of each KPC on the basis of sensitivity analysis theory. Then, different weighting values of KPCs are set to highlight the useful information. The weighted statistics are evaluated comprehensively by using the improved feature eigenvectors. The effectiveness of the proposed method is validated. The diagnosis results of the inverter indicate that the proposed method is superior to conventional KPCA.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.