Chemical pollution imposes limitations to the ecological status of European surface waters

Abstract

Aquatic ecosystems are affected by man-made pressures, often causing combined impacts. The analysis of the impacts of chemical pollution is however commonly separate from that of other pressures and their impacts. This evolved from differences in the data available for applied ecology vis-à-vis applied ecotoxicology, which are field gradients and laboratory toxicity tests, respectively. With this study, we demonstrate that the current approach of chemical impact assessment, consisting of comparing measured concentrations to protective environmental quality standards for individual chemicals, is not optimal. In reply, and preparing for a method that would enable the comprehensive assessment and management of water quality pressures, we evaluate various quantitative chemical pollution pressure metrics for mixtures of chemicals in a case study with 24 priority substances of Europe-wide concern. We demonstrate why current methods are sub-optimal for water quality management prioritization and that chemical pollution currently imposes limitations to the ecological status of European surface waters. We discuss why management efforts may currently fail to restore a good ecological status, given that to date only 0.2% of the compounds in trade are considered in European water quality assessment and management.

Multiple stressors determine river ecological status at the European scale: Towards an integrated understanding of river status deterioration

“…Based on the run-off data provided by PCR-GLOBWB, riverine nutrient loads were quantified using the process-oriented model F I G U R E 2 Broad river types of the river sub-catchment units considered (grey area: no data available) TA B L E 1 Number of river sub-catchment units (FECs), share of ecological status and area of FECs by each broad river type Zwart, 2006;Posthuma et al, 2020). This means that the mixture toxic pressure is a metric that meaningfully represents ecological impact magnitudes.…”

Probability maps of anthropogenic impacts affecting ecological status in European rivers

“…Despite the fact that the explanatory variables that emerge from the analysis are logically and physically meaningful, the inconsistency in reported impacts among countries is likely to play such a role as to undermine the applicability of a statistical model in this case. In general, the variability in number and pathways of chemicals of concern makes any assessment of chemical pollution impact very difficult, and the knowledge of contaminants from modelling or monitoring remains insufficient to characterize chemical pollution ( Posthuma et al, 2020 ). Nevertheless, recent efforts to build consistent continental scale picture of chemical pollution ( Pistocchi et al, 2019 , Van Gils et al, 2020 ) may advance detection of chemical pollution impact patterns ( Lemm et al, 2021 ).…”

Drivers of European bat population change: a review reveals evidence gaps

“…Burns et al (2016) found evidence for the positive impact of decreasing water pollution on five of these species. However, two-thirds of Europe's surface water is estimated to be in poor ecological status (Posthuma et al 2020), and some pollutants, such as toxic heavy metals, may persist in the environment for many years (Walker et al 2007). Another pollutant not yet studied in bats is microplastic.…”