2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0149-1970(00)00096-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical partitioning technologies for an ATW system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…High-level radioactive wastes generated during the electrometallurgical reprocessing of nuclear fuel to recycle U and transuranic elements will be immobilized in durable waste forms to facilitate handling, storage, transport, and final disposal in a geological repository [1,2]. The two principal high-level radioactive waste streams are salt waste contaminated with oxidized fission products and metallic waste comprised of activated cladding hulls and metallic fission products not oxidized under the processing conditions [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High-level radioactive wastes generated during the electrometallurgical reprocessing of nuclear fuel to recycle U and transuranic elements will be immobilized in durable waste forms to facilitate handling, storage, transport, and final disposal in a geological repository [1,2]. The two principal high-level radioactive waste streams are salt waste contaminated with oxidized fission products and metallic waste comprised of activated cladding hulls and metallic fission products not oxidized under the processing conditions [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technology promises important advantages when combined with a metal fuel fast reactor [1][2][3][4][5]. The electrochemical process based on Li reduction in Li 2 O-LiCl molten salt has been regarded as a promising technology for the metallization of uranium [2,[6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The behavior in PBT of the spent fuel management strategy, proposed by (Tálamo et al, 2004, Rodriguez et al, 2003 for the so called Deep Burn Modular Helium Reactor (DB-MHR) are analyzed. Three strategies for fuel management are compared: first of all, the traditional one, named "spent fuel"(SF) that uses spent fuel from LWR Second, the one in which the transuranic elements are divided in two groups, a "Driven Fuel" (DF) composed only by Plutonium isotopes and Np is used in PBT core like SF, and third, the fuel management strategy in which after the DF has reached the stationary state we feed PBT core with a layer of "Transmutation Fuel" (TF), composed by Am 241 , Am 243 and Cm 244 isotopes from spent DF and it is mixed after discharge from the reactor core with the Am and Cm isotopes, which were set-aside after UREX process (Laidler et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%