The insecticidal Cry toxins produced by the bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis are comprised of three structural domains. Domain I, a seven-helix bundle, is thought to penetrate the insect epithelial cell plasma membrane through a hairpin composed of ␣-helices 4 and 5, followed by the oligomerization of four hairpin monomers. The ␣-helix 4 has been proposed to line the lumen of the pore, whereas some residues in ␣-helix 5 have been shown to be responsible for oligomerization. Mutation of the Cry1Ac1 ␣-helix 4 amino acid Asn135 to Gln resulted in the loss of toxicity to Manduca sexta, yet binding was still observed. In this study, the equivalent mutation was made in the Cry1Ab5 toxin, and the properties of both wild-type and mutant toxin counterparts were analyzed. Both mutants appeared to bind to M. sexta membrane vesicles, but they were not able to form pores. The ability of both N135Q mutants to oligomerize was also disrupted, providing the first evidence that a residue in ␣-helix 4 can contribute to toxin oligomerization.The soil bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis produces proteins that display insecticidal properties. These Cry toxins are expressed as protoxins that are packaged as crystalline inclusions when the bacterium sporulates. When ingested by susceptible insect larvae, the protoxin is solubilized by the unique environment of the host gut and proteolytically cleaved or "activated" by the gut proteinases. The activated toxins are able to bind to receptor molecules present on the insect gut epithelium and insert into the membrane. This perturbation of the membrane results in the formation of pores, which is followed by colloid osmotic lysis and eventual insect death (for a review, see the article by Schnepf et al. [34]).Elucidation of the three-dimensional structure of two distantly related Cry toxins has revealed a similar three-domain arrangement whereby each domain possesses a distinct structural fold (16,27). Amino acid alignment of all Cry proteins demonstrates the presence of five conserved sequence blocks (19), suggesting that the members of the Cry family share this three-domain fold. The role of each domain has been studied extensively by mutagenesis and domain swap experiments (5,25,31,33). Domains II and III are thought to be responsible for the binding of the toxin to specific gut receptors. The binding of domain II is crucial to toxicity, since various mutations in this domain disrupt the toxicity and binding of the toxin to membrane vesicles (21,31,32,38). To date, mutations created in domain III have not dramatically reduced toxicity (5, 20); however, evidence suggests that this domain may have additional roles in toxin stability and channel function (6, 36).Association of the toxin molecule with the epithelial membrane is thought to cause a large conformational change, possibly via the disruption of interactions between domains I and II (37), that results in the insertion of a region of domain I into the membrane. Domain I is comprised of a seven-helix bundle with several helices long enoug...