2001
DOI: 10.1668/0003-1569(2001)041[0877:ciitcm]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical Interactions in the Cactus-Microorganism-Drosophila Model System of the Sonoran Desert1

Abstract: SYNOPSIS. The Cactus-Microorganism-Drosophila Model System of the Sonoran Desert represents an excellent paradigm of the role of chemistry in plant-animal interactions. In this system, four species of endemic Drosophila feed and reproduce in necrotic tissue of five species of columnar cacti. Studies over the past 35 yr have characterized a myriad of interactions between the three major components of the model system. The cacti contain a variety of allelochemicals which are primarily responsible for the highly … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
84
2
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
84
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Natural selection could act on the gene pool of each population to modulate the expression of behavioral elements that constitute larval foraging, particularly feeding rate. A high feeding rate could excess cellular capacity of detoxification (Fogleman and Danielson 2001). In contrast to the findings reported here, larvae of Chilean natural populations of endemic D. pavani and cosmopolitan D. melanogaster and D. simulans bred in apples, grapes, and peaches increase feeding rates, locomotion and turning as larval development proceeds (Ruiz-Dubreuil et al 1996;Godoy-Herrera et al 2004, 2005Medina-Muñoz and Godoy-Herrera 2004).…”
Section: Drosophila Funebris Larval Foragingcontrasting
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Natural selection could act on the gene pool of each population to modulate the expression of behavioral elements that constitute larval foraging, particularly feeding rate. A high feeding rate could excess cellular capacity of detoxification (Fogleman and Danielson 2001). In contrast to the findings reported here, larvae of Chilean natural populations of endemic D. pavani and cosmopolitan D. melanogaster and D. simulans bred in apples, grapes, and peaches increase feeding rates, locomotion and turning as larval development proceeds (Ruiz-Dubreuil et al 1996;Godoy-Herrera et al 2004, 2005Medina-Muñoz and Godoy-Herrera 2004).…”
Section: Drosophila Funebris Larval Foragingcontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…Turning behavior is estimated as numbers of turns per min. Latency is expressed in seconds different (Starmer 1981;Fogleman and Danielson 2001). P larvae of D. funebris coexist with larvae of D. buzzatii and D. simulans in cladodes of prickly pear (Flores 2004), whereas TT larvae breed in E. chilensis in the absence of larvae of other Drosophila species (Manríquez and Benado 1994).…”
Section: Drosophila Funebris Larval Foragingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We determined the rhizosphere bacterial communities of the two largest species of Sonoran Desert columnar cacti of the Cactoideae subfamily: (i) the saguaro cactus, Carnegiea gigantea, with a natural range in southwestern Arizona and Sonora, Mexico (64); and its ecological equivalent, (ii) the cardón cactus, Pachycereus pringlei, with a disjointed distribution in Baja California and Sonora, Mexico. These two closely related cactus species have an overlapping geographic distribution in a small area of the gulf coast of western Sonora, Mexico, and display similar columnar growth, reproductive adaptations (including the same bat pollinators), and biochemical composition (20,28,29). Related to the resource island hypothesis, seedlings from both species are commonly found shielded by nurse plants (e.g., mesquite trees of the genus Prosopis), and it has been suggested that a rich bacterial diversity in such niches promotes the growth of the cacti (6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One could speculate that the cuticular hydrocarbon composition would be a means of reproductive isolation of these subspecies. This could be similar to what happens with Drosophila mojavensis, a fly that feeds on cactus and whose reproductive isolation mechanism involves differentiated hydrocarbon profiles of populations feeding on different substrates (Fogleman and Danielson, 2001). It also could be somewhat similar to the mechanisms occurring in close species of moths which were reproductively isolated from each other by the concentration of the compounds in the same blend of sexual pheromones (Kaae et al,1973).…”
Section: Chromatogram Analysesmentioning
confidence: 52%