2023
DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.3c00451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical Inhibitors Targeting the Oncogenic m6A Modifying Proteins

Yue Huang,
Wenyang Xia,
Ze Dong
et al.

Abstract: Metrics & MoreArticle Recommendations CONSPECTUS: Epigenetics is brought to RNA, introducing a new dimension to gene expression regulation. Among numerous RNA modifications, N 6 -methyladenosine (m 6 A) is an abundant internal modification on eukaryote mRNA first identified in the 1970s. However, the significance of m 6 A modification in mRNA had been long neglected until the fat mass and obesity-associated (FTO) enzyme was identified as the first m 6 A demethylase almost 40 years later. The m 6 A modification… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The design of chemical inhibitors requires knowledge of the specific interactions between RNA and proteins. Such insights can be derived from crystal structures in combination with molecular dynamics simulations , and are supported by biochemical data obtained with mutated proteins, in which key functional amino acids in the active site are exchanged, e.g., by replacement with alanine. Introducing smaller changes by exchanging single functional groups via incorporation of artificial amino acids is more challenging (e.g., via stop-codon suppression).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The design of chemical inhibitors requires knowledge of the specific interactions between RNA and proteins. Such insights can be derived from crystal structures in combination with molecular dynamics simulations , and are supported by biochemical data obtained with mutated proteins, in which key functional amino acids in the active site are exchanged, e.g., by replacement with alanine. Introducing smaller changes by exchanging single functional groups via incorporation of artificial amino acids is more challenging (e.g., via stop-codon suppression).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Both enzymes belong to the family of nonheme iron­(II)- and α-ketoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases but remove the N 6 -methyl group via distinct reaction pathways: while demethylation by ALKBH5 directly yields adenosine accompanied by release of formaldehyde, , the oxidized intermediates N 6 -hydroxymethyladenosine (hm 6 A) and N 6 -formyladenosine (f 6 A) have been observed in the FTO-mediated pathway (Figure A). , While ALKBH5 has been observed to remove only internal m 6 A, preferably in DRACH motifs, FTO has also been shown to act on m 6 A m , m 1 A, m 3 U, and m 3 T. The dysregulation of m 6 A and associated writer, reader, and eraser proteins has been connected to tumor development and disease. Therefore, m 6 A-modifying proteins have gained increasing attention as targets for drug development . The design of chemical inhibitors requires knowledge of the specific interactions between RNA and proteins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although 2OG analogs such as IOX3 14 and citrate 15 and other inhibitors such as MV1035, 16 ALK-04, 17 cmp-3, cmp-6, 18 20m, 19 and Ena15, 20 generally exhibit good inhibitory activity on ALKBH5 demethylation in vitro , there still lacks highly selective and potent ALKBH5 inhibitors in vivo . 21 Moreover, the inhibitory activities of these inhibitors on tumor cells are far from satisfactory. The tumor cells treated with ALKBH5 inhibitors did not exhibit the same phenotype as ALKBH5-knockdown cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, our long‐term aim is chemical intervention and target druggability validation of FTO [8] . In 2012, we reported rhein as the first FTO inhibitor [9] and developed a proof of concept to demonstrate that the level of m 6 A could be regulated by chemical small molecules, and researchers have since been interested in developing FTO inhibitors [10a,b] . The currently reported FTO inhibitors can be classified into four categories according to the mechanism of recognition: (A) substrate‐competitive inhibitors, such as rhein, [9] meclofenamic acid (MA), [11] N ‐CDPCB, [12] fluorescein, [13] CHTB, [14] FB23/FB23‐2, [7] Dac51, [15] Dac85, [16] ZLD115, [17] FTO‐4, [18] and TR‐FTO‐43N; [19] (B) 2‐OG‐competitive inhibitors, such as R ‐2HG; [20] (C) substrate/2‐OG dual competitive inhibitors, such as entacapone [21] and HZ‐MA hybrid; [22] and (D) inhibitors with unverified mechanisms, such as CS1/CS2, [23] saikosaponin D, [24] and rhein derivative (Figure S1) [25]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%