2013
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical gradients in the Milky Way from the RAVE data

Abstract: Aims. We aim at measuring the chemical gradients of the elements Mg, Al, Si, and Fe along the Galactic radius to provide new constraints on the chemical evolution models of the Galaxy and Galaxy models such as the Besançon model. Thanks to the large number of stars of our RAVE sample we can study how the gradients vary as function of the distance from the Galactic plane. Methods. We analysed three different samples selected from three independent datasets: a sample of 19 962 dwarf stars selected from the RAVE … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

22
95
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
22
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15, we show results for the radial metallicity gradient and the MDF as a function of maximum height above the plane, for both the HQ and the Gold samples (for a complementary work, extending to more inner Galactocentric distances -but without kinematics -see Hayden et al 2013). In the recent paper by Boeche et al (2013b), the authors compare the gradients obtained from a RAVE dwarf sample with those of the Geneva-Copenhagen survey (similar to our approach, the authors provide their results with respect to the orbital parameter space (R g , z max ) 22 , but only for three bins of z max ). For comparison, their results are summarised in Table 3, along with our measured values.…”
Section: Disc Abundance Gradients and Variations Of The Mdf With Heigmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…15, we show results for the radial metallicity gradient and the MDF as a function of maximum height above the plane, for both the HQ and the Gold samples (for a complementary work, extending to more inner Galactocentric distances -but without kinematics -see Hayden et al 2013). In the recent paper by Boeche et al (2013b), the authors compare the gradients obtained from a RAVE dwarf sample with those of the Geneva-Copenhagen survey (similar to our approach, the authors provide their results with respect to the orbital parameter space (R g , z max ) 22 , but only for three bins of z max ). For comparison, their results are summarised in Table 3, along with our measured values.…”
Section: Disc Abundance Gradients and Variations Of The Mdf With Heigmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Using only stars close to the plane, within |Z| of 300 pc, we derive Δ[Fe/H]/ΔR = −0.068 ± 0.014 dex/kpc or Δ[Fe/H]/ΔR = −0.076 ± 0.010 dex/kpc (stars with ages ≤7 Gyr). Analysing RAVE spectra of disk dwarfs, Boeche et al (2013) found that Δ[Fe/H]/ΔR = −0.065 dex/kpc for Z max < 400 pc. For 300 < Z max < 800 pc, we obtain Δ[Fe/H]/ΔR = −0.114 ± 0.009 dex/kpc.…”
Section: Age-[α/fe] and Age-[fe/h] Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lee et al 2011;Bovy et al 2012b,c;Schlesinger et al 2012;Cheng et al 2012), RAVE (e.g. Boeche et al 2013), and APOGEE (e.g. Anders et al 2014;Hayden et al 2013), as well as smaller samples of stars with high-resolution observations (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, on global scales they are one of the key parameters in the study of the luminosity-metallicity and massmetallicity relations of galaxies, their evolution with time, and their dependence on environment or star formation rate (e.g., Lequeux et al 1979;Grebel et al 2003;Tremonti et al 2004;Erb et al 2006;Panter et al 2008;Zahid et al 2012;Sánchez et al 2013;Peng & Maiolino 2014;Zahid et al 2014;Izotov et al 2015, to just name a few of the many studies). Local measurements within galaxies reveal the position-dependent metallicity of the chosen tracer population and may show abundance gradients, which in turn hold clues about galaxy evolution (e.g., Searle 1971;Janes 1979;Maciel & Quireza 1999;Harbeck et al 2001;Andrievsky et al 2002;Chen et al 2003;Mehlert et al 2003;Cioni 2009;Haschke et al 2012;Boeche et al 2013Boeche et al , 2014Pilyugin et al 2014Pilyugin et al , 2015.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%