Ore Genesis 1982
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-68344-2_20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical Forms of Metal Enrichment in Recent Sediments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although sediment metal correlations might indicate the processes and mechanisms influencing the metal associations and behaviour, exact bonding and retention mechanisms might be explained by information on the geochemical phases that were not investigated. The importance of the various geochemical substrates as metal scavengers (Fe and Mn hydrous oxides, organic matter, clay minerals) depends on the sediment type, source and its chemical characteristics (Forstner 1982; Horowitz & Elrick 1987).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although sediment metal correlations might indicate the processes and mechanisms influencing the metal associations and behaviour, exact bonding and retention mechanisms might be explained by information on the geochemical phases that were not investigated. The importance of the various geochemical substrates as metal scavengers (Fe and Mn hydrous oxides, organic matter, clay minerals) depends on the sediment type, source and its chemical characteristics (Forstner 1982; Horowitz & Elrick 1987).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are based on a hierarchical ranking of correlation coefficients between the geochemical substrates and various trace elements. This listing is obviously different from the one provided by Forstner (1982a). The differences are due to a combination of factors including the source of the sediments (Forstner's data come from marine material while Horowitz and Elrick's data come from freshwater material) and the procedures used to define the various geochemical substrates (partitioning methods employed different operational definitions, see Section 2.3.4.2).…”
Section: Cation Exchange Capacitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common materials meeting these criteria are hydrous manganese oxides, and hydrous iron oxides, organic matter, and clay minerals (Table 2.3.2-1). Forstner (1982a) has listed these various geochemical substrates in descending order according to their capacity to collect and concentrate trace elements (Table 2.3.2-1). These results are based upon sequential extraction studies (see Section 2.3.4.2).…”
Section: Cation Exchange Capacitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies that have been conducted to determine heavy metals in different particle size fractions mainly focus on urban or roadside soil, road/urban dust and sediment (Sutherland 2003;Ljung et al 2006;Ajmone-Marsan et al 2008;Acosta et al 2009;Vlasov et al 2015;Khademi et al 2019;Zhang et al 2019), while very little data are available on the distribution of heavy metals in various particle size fractions from agricultural (Qian et al 1996;Gong et al 2014 The majority of the studies have shown that fine soil particles tend to concentrate and retain higher amounts of metals and have a stronger ability to carry potentially hazardous substances due to their high specific area, more organic matter and Fe/Mn/Al oxides content (Förstner 1982;Hardy and Cornu 2006;Gong et al 2014;Liu et al 2018). In coarser particle size fractions, with a lower sorption capacity, the concentrations of metals fully depend on the mineralogical composition, in particular the proportion of heavy minerals and neoformations (Protasova 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%